For transparency, bystanders should note I tagged this user as promoting Jill Stein last cycle, so there’s frankly a certain irony to this user in particular talking when their views contributed to Trump being reelected by wedge-driving and promotion of the Spoiler Effect.
For transparency, bystanders should note I tagged this user as promoting Jill Stein last cycle, so there’s frankly a certain irony to this user in particular talking when their views contributed to Trump being reelected by wedge-driving and promotion of the Spoiler Effect.
You comment a lot about your opinions of other users.
Uhhh, yeah bud. That is allowed. It’s a fucking public forum.
No it’s not! Other users can’t talk about other users. For example, when you sa- FUCK! I BROKE THE ONE RULE!
Who said it wasn’t allowed?
voting for Trump is what got Trump elected. people voting for Jill Stein were voting against Trump.
Jill Stein is a Republican plant and Russian stooge
How stupid can one be? No offense.
what I said is true
She’s on the Russian payroll and exists to be a spoiler candidate.
there was a Senate investigation into her funding, and it cleared her of this.
So then I guess the answer is “extremely”
if you can’t recognize the truth of two simple sentences, you are the one with a problem.
Uh-huh.
Oh ok so you don’t know how elections work in the US. Got it.
what I said is objectively true.