• someacnt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Security by obscurity does not work, because people are only so creative up to a point. Hence, there are only handful of configurations for the attacker to try out.

    This contrasts to e.g. 128-bit secure encryption, which involves trying 2^128 times to break it - which is a number with whopping 38 zeros. It takes 10^22 years to break it with trying at 1GHz rate. It is simply incomparable, and adding a few bits of security by obscure combination is simply not worth it.

    Yet, so many people and organizations seem to prefer obscurity to actual security.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It really depends on the purpose. Sometimes you can hide stuff in unexpected places when there isn’t much interest for other people to find it, or if they don’t even know about it’s existence.

      Also sometimes it is good enough to just delay the discovery of something for a while, because its value after a certain time diminished completely.

      So, I would argue that sometimes security by obscurity can be useful. But I agree that it generally shouldn’t replace proper encryption.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I know a dog called mister Dingleberry. Mister DingleBerry likes to dingle his berries. In dingling his berries he takes such delight, if he could he’d dingle his berries day and night.

    One time, I remember it well, he dingled his berries so hard, he tripped over them and fell.

    In dingling his berries he takes such glee, they say he dingles his berries mercilessly.

    He dingles and dangles his berries berry hard. One time he got completely dingleburried under em and let out a fart.

    The end.

  • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve learned a few things about some stuff to the point where I can definitely say I have some experience with them.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      And osmosis is the hyper fusion of water across a semipermeable membrane.

      I failed biology because I just refused to study (was an idiot), but that one always stuck with me.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    You can clean cooking pans and pots by heating them up and then pouring water on them. As the water boils it pulls all the stuck particles off with little to no scrubbing.

    You can also make a nice sauce if you use wine or some kind of stock.

  • mech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    You can’t go faster than light because time and space are basically the same thing, and you’re always moving through both of them together at a constant rate.
    When you stand still, you move only through time, at the top speed of one second per second.
    When you start moving through space, your speed doesn’t change, only your direction. (You can visualize it as an arrow showing your speed that stays the same length, but rotates in a coordinate system from the time axis towards the perpendicular space axis.) So the faster you move through space, the slower you move through time.
    At light speed, you’re moving only through space. Your movement through time is zero, so time stops for you.
    Going faster through space would mean going back in time, which would break causality.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      To be fair, what even is “standing still”? I’m sitting in a chair in a spaceship made out of almost all the elements and water traveling around 220km/s relative to Sagittarius A.

      • mech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s always in relation to a frame of reference.
        Compared to earth, you’re standing still, so your time passes at the same rate as earth time.
        Compared to Sagittarius A, you’re moving through space, so your time passes slower than that of Sagittarius A.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      When you stand still

      That’s not really possible, though, right? It is at a macro level, but you’re never not moving in 3d space at small levels, right?

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Cheers! I’ve never needed to know this. It will probably become relevant in future, now. So cheers for this!

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      My old man was a fan of Yes, and so when they went on tour sometime around maybe 2003, I don’t recall specifically, Rick Wakeman came back to play keys for the tour, and it was a real treat.

      • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think “intersect” keeps only the shared sections, so it would give you “Rick Man”, the exact opposite of what we need. We’d need an “exclusion” or an “XOR” to retain the non-shared sections.

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    The real secret to the most delicious sauces you’ve ever tasted is one anchovy fillet chopped into paste and simmered into the sauce, for every litre/quart of sauce you are making.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s why the Romans didn’t use salt as a condiment, but fish sauce. The umami+salt is different and objectively better.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I just made Serious Eats All-American Beef Stew earlier today, and they call for anchovies (which I had none, so I substituted fish sauce) as the umami bomb. But even for folks who get grossed out by little fish, it gets blended with chicken stock, tomato paste, Worcestershire sauce, and soy sauce (and gelatin), to create the base. Fish sauce has become a staple in my house for certain recipes, it’s great.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        MSG, yes, kindof. Just adding normal table salt will only give about 50% of the effect of the umami punch that anchovies provide. Possibly less, and it’s far too easy to add too much salt.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Young children don’t warn you when they learn how to open locks. Sometimes you find out when they’re rifling through your stuff or well down the road.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    Socrates only knows enough to know that he doesn’t know anything.

    The reason the Oracle of Apollo said “No man is wiser than Socrates” is because no man is wise, and Socrates is only wise enough to know himself to be a fool.