Thanks, I also appreciate your attempt at reaching out as well in the message before this one.

I can also see rationale behind your Squirrel explanation. I’ll keep that in mind in the future.

And I do 100% agree with all 3 of your points, there is no dispute there.

What you did is a textbook veiled accusation.

It was a loaded fucking question.

edit: I was just trying to let you know so you wouldn’t keep saying wrong things which we’ve already agreed is important.

You accused me of saying it was her fault she got murdered.

And I just told you why it matters and you just agreed it matters?

Wouldn’t you rather direct your anger without including incorrect information? It’s more impactful that way.

Well I wouldn’t really call the edits frantic, but I have a bad habit of writing something, and then realizing something could be more clear. You also attacked me pretty hard for using “talk to her” language when I was just going with the existing conversation, and I felt that deserved another reply.

What evidence am I trying to get you to disregard?

She was stopped in the middle of the road, for multiple minutes, impeding traffic while there was an ICE operation going on in the area. These are undisputed facts at this point. These aren’t alternative facts or anything like that, they are facts.

This was also clearly some act of civil disobedience, protest, or as others are suggesting, some form or trying to monitor the situation, but I haven’t seen any legitimate rational for what she did that wasn’t related to ICE activity.

If that activity is meant to impede ICE, then ICE had reason enough to approach her, and I don’t think it’s a stretch for ICE to be able to claim they believed it was related to their ongoing enforcement actions, but that might have to be tried in court.

I never once said that what the ICE officer did afterwards was acceptable or warranted.

We lambaste the far right for ignoring facts or making things up, or jumping to pitch forks on everything, but someone here saying there was no reason for ICE to be talking to her, and then this comment shit storm happening for simply pointing out, ICE had a reason to initiate contact, is the exact same problem we go on about with MAGA. That really saddens me. And honestly I wasn’t looking for this shit storm, I was just trying to inform the misinformed poster about why the ICE officer had initiated contact.

Also, what were learning about what happened is also changing quickly, and people might not even know the latest information, and is in fact what happened here.

OP that I was interacting with eventually replied to me

I have no idea what you’re talking about. I think I’ve seen 6-7 different videos and all of them so far start with her appearing to be turning the car around.

So I replied with the CNN video that has footage that started minutes before the ICE interaction where it shows her blocking the road for minutes.

OP has since said

Okay. So I was wrong initially said that they had no reason to talk to her. What difference does that make anyhow?

You know what would have happened if OP first reply to was that comment about 6-7 videos instead of a veiled accusation that I was saying it was her fault she was murdered?

I would have posted the video, they would have become more informed on the ever changing topic, and it would have been over.

As to what difference it makes - simply that they could properly focus their anger instead of saying something incorrect, which would add more validity to what they write.

So back to your what do i get question…

That there’s still some hope that discourse around opposing MAGA won’t fully go down the MAGA hole on the other end of the spectrum as well. Because if that happens, we might dig ourselves out of one hole, while digging ourselves into another, and comment chains like my reply started really has me fearing that that is the path were headed down.

Edit: P.S. This is a fake edit. I hope I don’t have to make a real edit after calling me out on edits.

She was there for minutes. There’s no real situation where she wasn’t doing that intentionally.

They have a legal basis if they are being impeded from their work. Impeded does not mean stopped.

Here you go

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/ice-shooting-minneapolis-renee-good-cell-phone-invs

You can start around the 40 second mark. They say she was there for a couple of minutes moving back and forth before the incident with ICE started.

And why do you think she parked in the middle of the road like she did?

Yes I saw that video.

That is still impeding. Impeding doesn’t only mean completely stopped / blocked or prevented.

also, for the record OP was using the “talk to her” language.

why is this asshole even talking to her

it’s not like he was talking to her in order to do his shitty job

I quoted what started this whole thing.

Dude said that, tthen I replied, and then he accused me of saying saying it was her fault she killed herself got murdered.

All I’m saying is they had every single right to initiate contact. What happens after that is completely another matter.

why is this asshole even talking to her? They operate on fully racist criteria so it’s not like he was talking to her in order to do his shitty job

Because she blocked the road and impeded their job.

End of fucking story.

Edit: And ya, you’re all idiots if you can’t see that.

Edit: And yes i’ve seen the videos, and 3d modelling and all that shit of what happened, including her parking in the road that intiated the contact.

She was impeding them. That gives them the ability to talk to her, traffic cop or not, wow.

OP can’t even understand why they were talking to her.

Hey man, you go ahead and park your car like she did somewhere populated and see how long until a cop comes to talk to you.

You’re an idiot if you think thats a fascist take.

No, I’m saying you were flat out wrong in your assertion that she did nothing to be approached by law enforcement officers.

why is this asshole even talking to her? They operate on fully racist criteria so it’s not like he was talking to her in order to do his shitty job

Take you pitchfork elsewhere and at least know WTF you’re talking about.

meaning why is this asshole even talking to her? They operate on fully racist criteria so it’s not like he was talking to her in order to do his shitty job

She was impeding traffic, that’s what started it all.

Vehicles were able to get around her moving slowly, but she parked perpendicular to traffic in the middle of the road.

Edit: I’m just going to edit this post here with this note and adding the quote above because things are ridiculous below. You block/impede the road, law enforcement is going to initiate contact. ICE, traffic cop, whatever. They initiated contact. Whatever the fuck happens after is another story, but OP’s “why is this asshole even talking to her” is a dead fucking simple answer. She was impeding traffic on the roadway, and they were there. If you all can’t understand that, or want to downvote me to oblivion because you can’t understand that, whatever go ahead.

edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._Royer is what would allow them to talk to her and initiate contact. Its everything that happened after that is the issue. She was not detained (from what I can tell), or being forced to do anything until the 2nd ICE vehicle arrived which seems to be a good 30 seconds later. The escalation happened after the arrival of the 2nd vehicle, and was initiated by the ICE agents in the 2nd vehicle.

It was also all recorded. I doubt it’d be anywhere near as big if it hadn’t been.

At which point can denmark/Greenland evict their military presence?

Brilliant.