• De_Narm@lemmy.world
    106·
    17 days ago

    Oh, the horror, they don’t starve babies! How will the american taxpayers ever recover from this?

  • Skunk [any]@lemmy.zip
    82·
    17 days ago

    Uh that rocks actually?? If my taxes would go to taking care of mothers and their babies I’d for real be stoked to pay them lmao I hope they got enough toys for the little ones and professional help like a midwife who specialises in nursing if they want it.

  • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
    53·
    17 days ago

    Who fucking cares? As in, who sits around and thinks about “oh fuck my tax money helped someone else?” I’m more concerned about fascist secret police, harassing minorities, etc. I personally don’t even care if my taxes help a drug addict on the street eat a meal.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      4·
      16 days ago

      Yes, well, they’re very concerned that any of their abhorrent hoarde would do anything other than evil if the government was capable at all of acting in the interests of the common people, instead of being puppets of monsters

  • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
    37·
    17 days ago

    I don’t live in NYC, but if I did, I would be proud that my money went to this. Humanity? For everyone? Regardless of class, country, or creed? Sign me the fuck up. I guess I should be asking for my money to go to more spikes on the benches to prevent people from sleeping on them at night, right?

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    16 days ago

    OMG, they were staying at a hotel? And the hotel provided the services they paid for? And the hotel gave them little free shampoos and soaps? The HORROR!

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zipEnglish
    5·
    16 days ago

    I don’t believe this story at all; if there’s the slightest bit of truth to it it’s probably that she saw any kind of charity happening and got mad.

    Get fucked, old billionaire bitch.

    edit: hmm, do we have proof that’s Elon posting?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      3·
      15 days ago

      We don’t have evidence, this was sparked by her account tweeting toward Elon speaking about “your mom” in third person and saying effectively that she met herself in 1966.

      However, since the story didn’t even make sense accounting for the third party tone, it’s more likely she meant to say “your grandmother” referring to her mother-in-law. Though they deleted the post rather than explaining/correcting, which is weird.

      However it’s also plausible because we know he has done sock puppeting, including his toddler son. I feel like sometimes she had weirdly conveniently timed and worded posts to reinforce some point Musk said.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zipEnglish
        2·
        15 days ago

        Thanks for taking the time.

        I guess the people who run that social media platform are the only ones who could shed some definite light on this … yeah

        And I don’t mean to say that I’d put it past him.

        Anyway, the rumour probably annoys the fuck out of him either way and that’s good enough for me.