also let’s just be clear here, it is not “violence” (in the sense that you seem to be using it) to protect yourself against violence instigated by others
Federal property is collectively everybody in the country’s property and if everyone in the country agreed to shut these facilities down then we would not be having this conversation.
The French started by uniting the people and bankrupting the state, so I reccomend you start there as well, because if you go into a war with a minority of the public to support you then you’re going to wind up less like the French and more like the Spaniards.
I am always extremely pedantic.
Violence is not a complaint or in any way a form of legitimate dialogue.
that’s just your opinion
also let’s just be clear here, it is not “violence” (in the sense that you seem to be using it) to protect yourself against violence instigated by others
Removed by mod
If ICE force their way onto your property, that’s their violence.
If you force your way onto federal property, that’s your violence.
Federal property is my property… it’s literally publicly owned property.
Federal property is collectively everybody in the country’s property and if everyone in the country agreed to shut these facilities down then we would not be having this conversation.
Removed by mod
Again, the concept of protest is not limited to legitimate dialogue.
I can go all day!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I suppose if you ignore every logical step then you can claim its definition is whatever you want.
We should come up with a word for this. How about an Ig-No Rant? You’re being Ig-no rant.
How did the French revolution go, again? One big ole peaceful protest, right?
Removed by mod
The French started by uniting the people and bankrupting the state, so I reccomend you start there as well, because if you go into a war with a minority of the public to support you then you’re going to wind up less like the French and more like the Spaniards.
Just so you know, you’re 100% wrong.