Hamas’ genocide is only limited by their capability, not by their intent.
Do you honestly think they were keeping count on that day and were like “whoah, we’re over 1000 we better stop!” Or do you think if they were capable of killing 1000 more people they would have? If they were capable of killing a million Jews, do you think they would?
Let’s not be naive, Hamas would kill every Jew if they could. The only reason they don’t is because they are opposed. If you support Hamas, you don’t think they should be opposed in their goals. Which means you want genocide. Hamas supporters are genocide supporters.
Yeah genocide is not about the actual harm you do in the real world, it’s about the harm you would have wanted to do if you could. According to this commenter’s speculation of how much you would have wanted it.
What a great definition. Are you fucking stoned or something?
Many more people were killed in the Vietnam war. Many more people starved in the Vietnam war. So many more people.
Was the Vietnam war genocide?
Is Russia’s war against Ukraine a genocide?
Was the Iraq War a genocide?
If you define it by the number of casualties, you’ll find most wars would have to be labelled genocide since the Israel-Hamas war had fewer casualties than many many other conflicts.
I pointed out the numbers to show the hypocrisy, you’re right, if hamas had the means they would kill as many Israelis as they could, any oppressed would do the same to their oppressors, but if you look at the other side, the people with the means to do it IS ACTUALLY DOING IT.
So by your logic, thinking of doing major harm as some admittedly fucked up form of retribution, is the same as, or maybe even worse than actually doing said harm for no reason other than for materialistic gains, which the IDF is doing
Wait let me check the definition of genocide real quick
Ok, let me see
Yep, definitely a genocide, mhm
And since wasn’t actually investigated no one even knows how many were killed by hamas vs idfs apache gunships
This is literally an article from a israeli propoganda news outlet, if these are their numbers, then the actual numbers cannot be much higher
Hamas’ genocide is only limited by their capability, not by their intent.
Do you honestly think they were keeping count on that day and were like “whoah, we’re over 1000 we better stop!” Or do you think if they were capable of killing 1000 more people they would have? If they were capable of killing a million Jews, do you think they would?
Let’s not be naive, Hamas would kill every Jew if they could. The only reason they don’t is because they are opposed. If you support Hamas, you don’t think they should be opposed in their goals. Which means you want genocide. Hamas supporters are genocide supporters.
Yeah genocide is not about the actual harm you do in the real world, it’s about the harm you would have wanted to do if you could. According to this commenter’s speculation of how much you would have wanted it.
What a great definition. Are you fucking stoned or something?
Many more people were killed in the Vietnam war. Many more people starved in the Vietnam war. So many more people.
Was the Vietnam war genocide?
Is Russia’s war against Ukraine a genocide?
Was the Iraq War a genocide?
If you define it by the number of casualties, you’ll find most wars would have to be labelled genocide since the Israel-Hamas war had fewer casualties than many many other conflicts.
I pointed out the numbers to show the hypocrisy, you’re right, if hamas had the means they would kill as many Israelis as they could, any oppressed would do the same to their oppressors, but if you look at the other side, the people with the means to do it IS ACTUALLY DOING IT. So by your logic, thinking of doing major harm as some admittedly fucked up form of retribution, is the same as, or maybe even worse than actually doing said harm for no reason other than for materialistic gains, which the IDF is doing