

Who are you directing your comment at? I am not reading anybody commenting anything resembling the straw man you describe in your comment.


Who are you directing your comment at? I am not reading anybody commenting anything resembling the straw man you describe in your comment.
This kind of bullshit comment is why people equate tankies with fascists.


They don’t care about sales, they got that sweet venture capital money and those stock prices.


They are a threat. They are murdering people right now.

Quite the stretch. There really isn’t any comparison to be done between a war of foreign aggression and a civil war in this context. Also didn’t the US allow a third time for Roosevelt during WWII for much the same reasons?


Also properly made lasagna with ragu alla bolognese contains very little tomato. It is a meat ragu, not a tomato sugo.


Why do you need a stranger on the internet to explain the simple definition of a well known word? Did you not go to school?
What is up with all these complete shit takes in this thread, like the one above?
Unfortunately the US was founded on the opposite of solidarity.
That is also exactly how it is depicted in the John Adams HBO miniseries.


I think you misunderstand his relationship with billionaires. Trump is an asset to billionaires. They have never had it as good as they have it under his administration. Removal of all regulation over their industries, dismantling of federal oversight and complete legal tax exemptions.
And all for what they consider pocket change as bribes to him.
Unfortunately it would be a completely unique thing if the powers of tiktok was wielded for good for once.


Well, the Italians do that as well (the last part). It is called Spaghetti all’assassina.


They would be very foolish to believe Trump would actually pay them that money. A Trump never pays his bills.
I mean, the dick ones are usually also pretty good.


And even if Democrats should somehow manage to win an election as some point in the future, they would never be able to gain enough votes to implement an amendment.


No, the current system enabled him, because it doesn’t take partisanship into account. The fabled checks and balances of the US constitution was created in a fantasy world where people of the same political party was meant to forget about that partisanship in favour of the plight of their office.
Actual realistic constitutions do not do that.
There is nothing to “believe”. We know how hurricanes are created.
Steadily going towards 99,9%.