

No. The story I believe you’re refering to has been admitted to having been false by the very person who originated it. The correction just never stuck and people continue to spread the false version even to this day.
Did Elon Musk Turn Off Starlink Access in Crimea To Disrupt Ukrainian Attack?
It wasn’t enabled in Crimea in the first place. The author misspoke/lied about in the book and has later admitted it.
U.S. sanctions to Russia forbid the use of Starlink. This includes crimea and the occupied territories. That’s why it wasn’t enabled.
To clarify on the Starlink issue: the Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not. They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war.
And before someone points out the ‘cause major war’ things, those are Walters words, not Elon’s. Musk said “It would make SpaceX explicitly complicit in a marjor act of war and conflict escalation” He later also added that had he been contacted by the US officials and asked to enable it he would, but they didn’t.








But he did now. Just like he sent bunch of free terminals to Ukraine when the war started - not to Russia. Yet people still conclude this somehow illustrates his “pro-russia” stance which never quite made any sense to me. Hell, he even offered to personally fight Putin.