I agree with the post but it conveniently avoids the actual issue. They are blamed for:
I’m not saying that they do affect these negatively, but that these two subjects are making life harder for regular people. So when someone sees something like “immigrants don’t affect me”, they just assume the poster is rich enough not to be squeezed like the rest of us.
Capitalism gotta have its scapegoats or else it won’t work.
Excellent
He takes long in the shower, tries to optimize, decides to just live there instead
You’re claiming that if capitalism tends to backslide into X, then X is part of capitalism. My point is that every system can backslide into something more primitive where a strong man makes the rules.
I mean, that’s such a broad take, any system can change, doesn’t mean it’s inevitable. My point was that the core mechanism of capitalism, which is the private ownership of capital and means of production, will always concentrate wealth and power further and further.
We have had systems of feudalism and monarchies that have stayed steady for hundreds of years. In pre history, people lived in communes for thousands of years.
What is unique about capitalism is that it must move as fast as possible, hence why it can’t stay steady, thereby it changing to late stage is part of the design (as in you can’t have capitalism without it), whereas any other system does not, through its own mechanism, move towards some kind of endgame.
So just because it’s possible for any system to become corrupt that means they are all the same?
I’m claiming that capitalism in particular is one of the most corruptible systems, it’s basically by design.
It tries to harness the power of greed and turn it into positive sum games, which don’t seem to work in practice after early stage capitalism.
It’s an optimization problem, how can we minimize corruptions by changing what forces drive our society. I think greed driving society maximizes corruption and think we should replace that with something else. Saying all systems can become corrupt doesn’t add anything to the task at hand.
If capitalism will always naturally morph into this late stage that seems similar to feudalism, then that’s part of capitalism.
It’s like saying you like playing monopoly but then after all the properties are bought out you turn around and say it’s no longer monopoly.
So more stable than windows 11? What happens to the cpu when the moon is full and you click on the start menu?
Sure,
Timothy Afleck
Like twitter and Reddit? Are there others?
Loops: am I a joke to you?
Turns out turning sunlight into food and then burning it is very inefficient, who could have guessed /s
This gives me hope, this is the only thing that can stop this momentum, having the middle management of GOP get hollowed out.
This could be the first nail in the coffin. GOP has always been pro rich people but unless your oligarch level rich, you want peace in your streets.
The entire reason why we got here is that neoliberal centrists clutched their pearls at the thought of taxes so kept siding with fascists.
Fascism can only succeed if it fools the liberals before they take total control, looks like they are getting ahead of themselves, probably cause the orange’s shelf life.
I mean, I think the same thing before I visit coastal cities
There is one more step, they are put on a vibrating mesh which has holes big enough for the seeds but not the pulp.
Honestly, it could have been a gif
I have a windows 11 installation without an account. You got to get an alternative image (I got LTSC).
I was really hoping there would be a jailbroken version of windows by now, you know a version that doesn’t update and doesn’t have any bloatware.
I guess it’s just not worth it given how far Linux has advanced.
If there is a contract then that’s not a thing you own, it’s more like you leasing your living room.
I can leave everything I own in a storage space, if I can’t then I don’t own it.
It’s free though. As in you can “buy” it to try and hack it or just not use it to make the company lose money.
Yes, my point was that even though educated people would agree, you would push the uneducated further with rhetoric like this.
Having said that, that’s not a problem with an audience such as us.