• rhabarba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    You give up all control over your system to other US corporations though, like Red Hat (who are - and should be held, IMO - responsible for systemd) and Microsoft (who contribute quite some code to the kernel). The only system you control is a system you write, I’m afraid.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Red Hat: Hi here’s some tools we made, you can see how every single one of them works in full detail and you can modify them as you see fit, and distribute modified copies.

      Microsoft: Hi we peddle proprietary spyware and we aren’t even secretive about it.

      Basically the same thing?

      Also systemd rocks, and the kernel is widely audited OSS, Microsoft will have a very hard time sneaking in anything malicious.

      • rhabarba@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        systemd rocks

        I disagree.

        the kernel is widely audited OSS

        Minus the proprietary blobs, that is.

        “Everyone can see the code” does not mean that everyone understands what’s going on, by the way. The X server had had a security hole for 23 years just a while ago. Could it be that “it’s OSS” and “many people read and understand what’s going on” are not the same thing?

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          The fact that software contains vulnerabilities is not the same as the fact that the software has been specifically designed to monitor your activities. I don’t understand what your point is, seems like you’re trying to say that the difference in the surveillance performed by Microsoft and the one performed by Linux is irrelevant.

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Setting aside the fact that that is not even remotely true, do you think Linux = Red Hat? What about almost every other distro being run by volunteeers?

      I’ve only ever seen redhat used by government and some corporations. As far as the broader community goes (especially the foss community), they are a pretty minor player.

      It’s honestly insane that you can sit there and shill for Microsoft these days. They’ve always been pretty evil, but now they’ve gone so far off the deep end they’re even driving away people who have been all-in on Microsoft their whole lives. Even non-tech people are getting simply fed up with all of the spying and intrusive, AI-infested bullshit. Linux marketshare has been steadily increasing over the last couple of years, and it doesn’t look like it’s slowing down anytime soon. And all of it is, ultimately, because Windows is forcing people away.