Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoAmazonquokk.auimagemessage-square94linkfedilinkarrow-up1823arrow-down17file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1816arrow-down1imageAmazonquokk.auViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square94linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoLol oh that was the “witty snarky lemmy-ism”, but not your reply pretending that you thought they meant homeless people?
minus-squareim_fine_sandy@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agoMy reply about homeless people was pointing out the unintended consequences of their daft “tax payers” assertion. If that’s something you would describe as a witty or snarky response, that’s up to you I guess.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoOh fuck off, you know I’m right. You did the exact same thing you were criticizing.
minus-squareim_fine_sandy@nord.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoOk ? I’m criticizing an idiot that said police shouldn’t protect people who don’t pay tax. Clearly a position they hadn’t really thought through.
Lol oh that was the “witty snarky lemmy-ism”, but not your reply pretending that you thought they meant homeless people?
My reply about homeless people was pointing out the unintended consequences of their daft “tax payers” assertion.
If that’s something you would describe as a witty or snarky response, that’s up to you I guess.
Oh fuck off, you know I’m right. You did the exact same thing you were criticizing.
Ok ?
I’m criticizing an idiot that said police shouldn’t protect people who don’t pay tax. Clearly a position they hadn’t really thought through.