sanitation@lemmy.todayBanned from community to me_irl@lemmy.world · 1 month agome_irllemmy.todayimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down16
arrow-up1190arrow-down1imageme_irllemmy.todaysanitation@lemmy.todayBanned from community to me_irl@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareHereIAm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoWhy would just the act be enough? I could still come around the next day and say I never signed those papers, and the proof is my signatures never look the same? (As a hypothetical, normally you’ll have similarities still)
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoTypically there is at least one witness too: the cashier, a lawyer, the other party. So, when there is a dispute that makes it to a court of some kind there’s evidence.
Why would just the act be enough? I could still come around the next day and say I never signed those papers, and the proof is my signatures never look the same? (As a hypothetical, normally you’ll have similarities still)
Typically there is at least one witness too: the cashier, a lawyer, the other party.
So, when there is a dispute that makes it to a court of some kind there’s evidence.
That’s true. 🙂