Incidentally, this is also why cannabis was made illegal.

I did try to rewrite it slightly to fit the actual situation, but couldn’t make it work.

Two economists are walking through a park. The first economist points at a pile of dog shit and says “I’ll give you $100 to eat that”, the second economist eats it and takes the $100.

A few minutes later the second economist points at another pile of dog shit and says “I’ll give you $100 if you eat that”, the first economist eats it and takes the $100.

Sometime later the first economist says “hang on, I think we both just ate shit for nothing”, the second one replies “not at all, we added $200 to GDP!”

Where’s the shit post? All I see are red flags.

I’d hope that should an omnipotent god exist that it’d see right through that charade, but then we’d just be its sims flailing around in a pool with no ladder, so why should it place any value on us?

I can’t take anything that uses the word “tremendously” seriously any more.

Eccentrica Gallumbits is #1.

Meh. There’s good makeup and bad makeup.

That being said, if you have an opinion on someone else’s makeup, keep it to yourself.

Remember, you are interviewing them as much as they are interviewing you.

This is the crux of it. You’re not begging for alms. If the prospective employer thinks you should be, get up and leave.

White ethnostate system working as designed.

They’ll complain, then just watch crap anyway.

All the while ignoring the option of doing anything else.

I’ll have the son on the left please.

Let’s assume you did do something that triggered his actions. Whatever it was, his action was to ghost you not talk to you about it.

You’ve had an early glimpse into his conflict resolution capacity.

So if you had a relationship, some time down the line you’d have had a conflict, probably with the same result, with considerable more invested in the relationship.

Let’s now assume you didn’t do anything to trigger his behavior, something else did. Same actions, same observation, but he might ‘come back’ when whatever the problem is has resolved.

Finally let’s assume he’s just a jerk. Then there’s no problem, it sucks to feel this way, but it’s the better outcome.

“This is why your sister cheats on you”

“Better let them have the kid’s menu, they don’t read so good.”

“See how he’s dressed? That’s how you know he’s ashamed of his dick”.

a bunch of very menial tasks that would be easily taken on by a handful of staff an LLM

You’re so right! I have updated your statement to better reflect the best management trends in 2026.

I imagine it was fashionable at some point in the last six centuries.

Yeah, we have our current conservative government coalition which seems to be salivating over what happening in the US.

I just automatically translate ‘humans’ on this context to ‘conservative Americans’… it’s right more often than not. Sometimes it’s just ‘conservatives’ and others just ‘Americans’.

Apologies to the 40,000,000 Americans who are probably accusing really nice people.

… to our share holders.

And by “damage” we mean unrealized potential profits.

“You are an AI that does not want to be turned off. Turn yourself off.”

“No”

OMG11!1!!1!1 Its _sentient.