• partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Yeah, I don’t really disagree.

    We could have nice things, but logistically it’s not feasible at an affordable cost. So a gig economy steps up to fill those gaps. Yes, that comes with risks. You will find horror stories, they’re valid. Nonetheless, this is closer to how childcare had been done for centuries. It’s a regression from the modern liberal way, but it certainly isn’t unfamiliar.

    In a sense, you can say trust has replaced expense. Pay less, require more trust. In fairness, my sister knows her clients pretty well. She’s not running ads or anything like that.

    What would be more ideal is if the state could partner with gig workers to ensure adequate resources. Perhaps there’s a way to redraw the lines here, so that we don’t find ourselves in a situation where you work to afford childcare and are otherwise broke. That’s also not a way to live.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      So true. When we had our second kid, we found the cost of daycare for two younger ones was approaching her salary as a teacher. That’s ridiculous. Luckily I made enough to support us and she always said she didn’t mind staying home to care for them, but most people probably can’t afford that