• inari@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      It was probably just an excuse to retaliate against Anthropic for not allowing the Pantagon to use their models

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m not sure too many people do. They are just very actively pushing this rethoric. Flooding the news cycles, so there’s no room for the actual news that exposes their real intentions, like the Epstein files.

      • IratePirate@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        …after a hefty bribe to Emperor Poopiepants, who has found an opportunity to turn Anthropic’s marketing into a shakedown.

  • mczolly@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not sure if this is

    • extra push for their hype
    • revenge for not helping with AI assisted bombing of children
    • government panicking about their hype
    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Are you not using AI at all? I still think this is a bubble about to burst, but also, they each do have actual groundbreaking products. Doesn’t mean I believe Altman or OpenAI will necessarily be around in 15 years, but in my opinion they’re more of a WebVan than they are anything.

      They are conning people by selling the lie that they are replacing the working class, that I agree with. But they still have something that will stick around, even if it ends up being less loud in our lives. The bubble will burst, but it won’t disappear.

      • Miller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I agree that people that dismiss current AI models as hype and slop have not used them to any extent. I am constantly astounded by their abilities. The problem with dismissing them as a grift is that it is a distraction from how we should be thinking clearly about how to confine them in the event that they are not a grift.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          They are, at best, an unreliable tool you need to babysit. And because of that, you need to be able to do what you’re asking the tool to do so you can verify it actually did what you asked.

          That’s is not at all how these tools are being marketed, or how many are using them. So the current result is 90% of usage is hype and slop.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Scarily accurate” lol what a bullshit headline. It sounds like hype.