VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoSorry bout your heartdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1916arrow-down127
arrow-up1889arrow-down1imageSorry bout your heartdiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square52linkfedilink
minus-squareToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up67·5 days agoEither there is an extra zero or a missing decimal point?
minus-squarecogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up72arrow-down1·5 days agoBoth of the % signs in the reply should be removed as well.
minus-squareYoiksAndAway@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up81·5 days ago“% per 100k” caused physical pain in my head.
minus-squareHadriscus@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down2·edit-25 days agodon’t you know 07% out of 100k is lower than 05.7k out of 100%
minus-squareStarik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·5 days agoIf it’s 5.7% per 100k, what percent is it per 200k?
minus-squarewonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoAh yes, the classic ‰^00^
minus-squareOddMinus1@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoYeah, so with a population of 200k, the homicide rate is 11.4%. The real havoc appears when you approach a population of ~2M and 100% homicide rate.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·5 days agoI’m also annoyed that they did the homicide rate as per-capita, but the homelessness numbers are given without comparison to total population
minus-squarejj4211@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·5 days agoThen going on to cite a specific food security stat on one hand, and leave it vague on the other. I totally believe the numbers favor them, but that’s all the more reason to get them right …
minus-squareToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoOmg you’re right!
minus-squaregh0stb4tz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·5 days agoTotally missing a decimal point. The numbers are actually a little off, per my search, but the gist of it is correct.
Either there is an extra zero or a missing decimal point?
Both of the % signs in the reply should be removed as well.
“% per 100k” caused physical pain in my head.
don’t you know 07% out of 100k is lower than 05.7k out of 100%
If it’s 5.7% per 100k, what percent is it per 200k?
11.4%
102.6% per 1800k
Seems high
Ah yes, the classic ‰^00^
Yeah, so with a population of 200k, the homicide rate is 11.4%. The real havoc appears when you approach a population of ~2M and 100% homicide rate.
I’m also annoyed that they did the homicide rate as per-capita, but the homelessness numbers are given without comparison to total population
Then going on to cite a specific food security stat on one hand, and leave it vague on the other.
I totally believe the numbers favor them, but that’s all the more reason to get them right …
Omg you’re right!
Totally missing a decimal point. The numbers are actually a little off, per my search, but the gist of it is correct.