• mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    US intelligence believe Iran isn’t aiming to build a nuke, but didn’t provide any source to that claim

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/20/trump-says-us-intelligence-wrong-about-iran-not-building-nuclear-bomb

    Also, why should we stop at 90%? If tomorrow we’ll find proof Iran has enriched to 90%, you could claim “Well, they just enriched to 90% as a negotiation tool.

    No I would not claim that. 90% is weapon grade enrichment, 60% is not

    Oh, and your claim is somewhat self-contradictory - If it’s so clear Iran is enriching uranium as a negotiation tactic, doesn’t that make the tactic pointless?

    Before the usa started the second aggression on Iran. Iran was willing to agree for zero enrichment proving again the point . Iran only enriching to 60% after Trump teared up the deal and Iran agreeing to zero enrichment . Those two evidence shows that Iran did not seek a nuke but to negotiate. The failure do not prove that it was just an excuse by Iran

    • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/20/trump-says-us-intelligence-wrong-about-iran-not-building-nuclear-bomb

      Sorry, “United States President Donald Trump has said…” isn’t really a reliable source for me.

      No I would not claim that. 90% is weapon grade enrichment, 60% is not

      But 60% lacks any civilian uses, so the most obvious reason to go to 60% is because it’s between 20% and 90%…

      Those two evidence shows that Iran did not seek a nuke but to negotiate.

      Now you’re just switching arguments. That doesn’t really address what I said about you argument being self-contradictory.

      Anyway, I think I’ve learned all I can from you. Feel free to have the last word.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Sorry, “United States President Donald Trump has said…” isn’t really a reliable source for me

        Yes trump is not a reliable source yet you agree with Him and spread his lie. The American intelligence is , it said Iran was not seeking a nuke

        But 60% lacks any civilian uses, so the most obvious reason to go to 60% is because it’s between 20% and 90%…

        Again yes 60% for civilian has little civilian usage but can be used in negotiation

        Now you’re just switching arguments. That doesn’t really address

        I did not. Those two arguments shows that Iran was not seeking a nuke but rather was willing to give up enrichment

        Anyway, I think I’ve learned all I can from you. Feel free to have the last word.

        I learned that you are a zionist scum trying to manufacture consent for the USA and Israel aggression on Iran