• CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    How do you run centralised production without some form of central oversight? How do you decide which commune gets the power plant or local food distribution hub.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      29 days ago

      You don’t have centralised production or centralised oversight, you have distributed systems and mutual aid.

      How do you decide? Some far away central body knows best for the needs of the local people despite never being there? Are those deemed less important to suffer because statistics dictate someone else gets the goods.

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        Can all production be practically done in a distributed manner?

        Plenty of industry works best at scale-- you’re not going to build neighbourhood-scale high-performance steel mills or semiconductor fabs.

      • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Centralised production is the only option in some forms of production, is every town going to have it’s own steel mill or power plant?

        • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          29 days ago

          See the mutual aid part? That means peoples can work together for larger scale needs.

          People are capable of voluntarily working together to create complex things without being ordered at gunpoint.

          • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            28 days ago

            Yes sure, but there will be centralised production and because of that implicitly a form of centralised power.

            • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              28 days ago

              Not how it works buddy.

              Can’t have power if everyone leaves a worksite due to some wannabe despot. Being distributed allows flexibility and choice.

              And when there is no state apparatus to force people to be beholden to power, there is no power to stop them.

              • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                Doesn’t have to be one person, it can be the majority workers in a centralised production system deciding to stop exporting something to a certain region because they don’t like them for whatever reason.

          • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            28 days ago

            Anarchism is what the world had before we started forming governments. If anarchism is a good and viable means of self-governing, why is it not adopted in countries across the globe? Why is there so much history of structured society overcoming anarchy? Where are all the utopian anarchist societies today?

            • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              28 days ago

              Where are all the utopian anarchist societies today?

              Destroyed by people that like hoarding power, be it capitalist or self-proclaimed “communist”.

              What you’re calling “overcoming” is actually “backstabbing” once anarchists are no longer needed.

      • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        My point is you will end up in situations where one town or city might a nuclear reactor which powers the whole region. So then you end up with inbalances of power between locally controlled production.

        • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          A nuclear power plant would need consumers as much as it needs engineers. Any place that builds it would be dependent on other communes to balance the load.

          • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            Why would it need consumers? It can function fine without unless you are describing a capitalist economy. No need to balance the load either one nuclear power plant can sustain the region where all the power plant workers live with electricity.

            • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              28 days ago

              Exactly, and to balance the load you need someone consuming the generated power. Which in case of a nuclear plant needs a lot of people, otherwise you’ve just wasted a ton of resources, time and space on a Stalker cosplay set

              No need to balance the load

              I don’t think you know anything about how electricity and power grids work. Unless we invent superbatteries that are several orders of magnitude more efficient than current ones, you need to balance the load if you want to actually use the power plant that you built.

              • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                26 days ago

                Oh yea. Things will get very HOT, very QUICK if you don’t balance that load, especially with how much output nuclear has. Even if you’re just trying to shed the excess and waste it, you have to be able to discharge it fast enough.

                And it’s just more mutually beneficial to share that power with others.

              • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                25 days ago

                Maybe energy is not a good representation of the point i’m trying to make.

                Take steel production for instance, in my country there is 1 steel mill that supplies the whole country and partially surrounding countries. This gives the group controlling that factory power, these central power structures will exist even in anarchist societies and whenever i bring this up it just gets handwaved away like it will be fine mutual interest, everyone will be nice end of story.

                But i think there will still be friction and collectives not getting along even in a classless society, especially right at the advent coming out of capitalism.

                • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  Well if your town has a steel mill and nothing else, why would you be an asshole and withhold your products from everyone else if you need to get other stuff elsewhere? Your scenario is only realistic if one commune somehow perfectly lucks out into eternal self-sufficiency.

                  • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    Because some regions have almost no important export, so if the town containing the steel mill thinks they deserve better infrastructure, hospitals, etc, than other towns but aren’t getting it, this can cause animosity to grow causing them to demand more services or decrease/stop exporting metal.

                    Seems like something that could feasibly happen when you have power imbalances that come with centralised production. We have to contemplate these issues even in a classless society.

          • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            We need some baseload electricity production to support renewables doesn’t have to be nuclear, could be storing energy by filling a dammed lake or something along those lines.

    • Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      You build a community that cares and values each other, a society of trust. I can already hear your thoughts, “oh vey how does anyone get rich off that?”

      • CultuurMarxist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        If you build a classless organisation of production i think that will drastically reduce tension in society from a lack of class war and allow for development of community, however we shouldn’t be utopian and pretend like no friction between people will exist, it won’t all be all trust and care.