Iran will completely shut the strategic Strait ​of Hormuz if Trump executes threats to target Iranian energy facilities, ​the country’s Revolutionary Guards ​said in a statement on ⁠Sunday.

Trump on Saturday threatened ​to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants ​if Tehran did not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within ​48-hours, suggesting a significant ​escalation barely a day after he ‌talked ⁠about “winding down” the war, now in its fourth week.

In their Sunday statement Iran’s ​Revolutionary ​Guards ⁠also said companies with U.S. shares will ​be ‘completely destroyed’, if Iranian ​energy ⁠facilities were targeted by Washington and energy facilities ⁠in ​countries that host ​U.S. bases will be ‘lawful’ targets.

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m in a very very privileged position to be able to say this, but I am more than happy to pay a little bit extra at the pump and on my gas bill, just for that colossal fuckwomble to be shown up on the world stage for being a weapons grade tosser.

    Is it childish? Yes. Does it make me feel slightly better about the world? Also yes.

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      How long do you think that position will last?

      If energy infrastructure is destroyed, then “paying a little bit extra at the pump” is just the beginning. You will need to reduce your overall consumption by 15-20%.

      Remember the worst month of Covid? That’s the last time consumption was reduced so heavily. Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years as energy infrastructure is rebuilt.

      The joy of Trump’s downfall will not be enough to mask the real economic pain, unfortunately.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years

        You say that as if I haven’t already been doing that.

      • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        I feel like this would be a net win for the world. Everyone in the old empire is shooting themselves in the dick right now. If Iran stops the flow of oil, countries are going to be forced to very, very, very quickly invest heavily in renewables more than they already are.

        This idiot may have single handedly put a dent in global warming.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Also an Oil Shock will almost certainly cause the AI bubble to burst, another win which also reduces global warming.

          Personally I would also love to see the ended of the Reserve Currency status for the USD, which is a possible consequence of the reduction in use of Oil (though it’s a less likely outcome in the short and even mid term).

          PS: By the way, great username.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I also recognize my privileged position when I say this: I’m pretty sure I can tolerate it longer than the American Oligarchs will tolerate the loss of profit and start using those politicians they’ve purchased to put an end to it.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It will accelerate energy transition.

        Even Fertilizers can be produced from renewable power (the hydrogen needed to make Amonia can be produced by electrolosys) and need not be made from gas.

        A short sharp pain might be in the best mid and long term interest for most of us, the environment and even parts of the Middle East itself (American interference there makes no sense if their Oil is just another unimportant mineral product) and it might even lead to the end of the USD Reserve Currency status.

    • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Shit. Maybe the Alberta oil sands will finally be profitable! Haha, nah just kidding. They wont.

      • quackerjo@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’ve been profitable for some time.

        A lot of people say they’re profitable at $60/barrel, but it’s more like between $50 and $80, depending on a bunch different factors, such as location and extraction method.

        But that’s only considering profitability in the terms of the current political system.

        If a new system came along that factored in harms to the environment, global warming, etc., they could go back to being unprofitable.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      So the tens of millions that are going to suffer famine across the global south, and the tens of thousands that will die in the third world hospitals without power, are price you’re willing to pay?

      Good to know.

      • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        No you illiterate fuck, I said I’d pay a little more at the pump to see one of the most narcissistic and dangerous world leaders get knocked down a peg or two on the world stage.

        It’s soul destroying seeing the human cost of such a conflict, but your virtue signalling is both misplaced and ineffective.

        • berg@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You don’t get one without the other. You don’t get to choose.

          • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I don’t disagree with you. It’s desperately sad.

            edit: I’d made the erroneous assumption this was a reply to a higher level comment.

            What is it that you’re suggesting here?

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You’re literally cheering for what you view as set of political upsides to war, and when I point out the rest of it, you get defensive.

          I wonder why.

          • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think this wondering you’re doing is the root cause of your problem.

            You’ve come up with an idea that I think there’s any political upsides to war based on some assumption that I haven’t quite figured out yet.

            You’ve come up with an entire “rest of it” which doesn’t really follow anything presented in the original post.

            Your “gotcha” moment doesn’t exist and is aimed at someone deeply saddened and angered by this pointless war.

            • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              3 days ago

              I appreciate you think that you have a point, and that it’s coherent, but you don’t, and it’s not.