• CXORA@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    No, once again restating the distinction you are making does not explain the value of making the distinction.

    The phrase “adhere to an ism” is absolutely meaningless in the context of atheism. It feels like pedantic word games.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Atheism isn’t a single word exceptional of the rest of English. You have a misunderstanding. Whether you improve on it or not is dependent on your ego, however an entire established d language will not change itself to suit a your opinion.

      The term you’re likely thinking of is ‘non-theistic’. That is a state of being without deities; thoughts, being, existential state. I recommend you do some quick reading into morphemes, specifically -ic, -ism, -ist. You will confuse people less—especially multilingualists that have English as a second lamguage—and not make impossible statements like ‘newborns are atheists’.

      I’m just trying to help.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Bud I’m using the literal dictionary definition here. I’m sorry to have to tell you this, but sometimes words in English are used differently than their etymology or structure might suggest.

        And you notably, again, refuse to answer the question.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          You’re not.

          Please show a dictionary definition that a newborn can adhere to. They all speak of disbelief, belief, or ideology. These are phases no being is able to be without first having an understanding of the thing they are disbelieving, believing, or adhering to. This is the literal point of an ism. This is why words end with ism.

          As for your question, it has been answered. I’m starting to think you simply have a misunderstanding you are not willing to adjust due to pride. Please point out how the question has not been answered and I will do my best, though, this is clearly a huge waste of time for both of us and I won’t participate much longer if there is no benefit for either of us.

          • CXORA@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            You’ve said it… disbelief. not believing. Infants do not believe in any gods, so they lack belief in gods. By definition.

            My man, if the insults and digs were going to work they would have worked a long time ago. The question is clear, and has been repeated ad nauseum. I was willing to listen, but you were not willing to respond, so forget it. Either you can tell me what you don’t understand about my question, or you can leave.

            • saltesc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Disbelief is a form of belief. On the spectrum of faith, it is refusal of the thing.

              Choosing to not believe in something is disbelief. Not believing in something choicelessly is not.

              How could a child express disbelief in something they have no knowledge of? They cannot believe or disbelieve in it. They don’t know what it is. The spectrum is non-existent for them, literally. They cannot align themselves on whether something is true/real or not because they don’t know what the thing is yet. They cannot be an ist in ANYTHING without knowing what the prefixing topic of the ism is.

              There are no insults, so that’s affirming news to me on your position. Thanks for calling me a man. Good luck with your interpretation of English and ideologies, but don’t expect the world to change for you any time soon.

              • CXORA@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Disbelief is explicitly not a belief. it is a lack of belief.

                And children absolutely can and do believe or lack belief in things. famously santa claus as an example.

                You have repeatedly told me that I have failed in literacy, my grasp of english and reigning in my ego. You are a bully and a liar.