• socphoenix@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    According to interviews and presentations viewed by WIRED, the goal of these cities would be to have places where anti-aging clinical trials, nuclear reactor startups, and building construction can proceed without having to get prior approval from agencies like the Food and Drug Administration, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Yes because the first thing I think needs regulations is fucking nuclear power!

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If anyone reads that and goes “hell yea”…

      Also what the fuck is a “nuclear reactor startup”?!? God, tech bros really take a whole bunch of privilege and advantage and just throw it all away to be dumber than anyone could have thought possible.

      • Celsulus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The double-meaning of the word “startup” might throw people off, but when the other items from the list in the quote are “trials” and “construction” you can imagine they are talking about an action rather than an entity. Here a “reactor startup” would be the process of a reactor going from subcritical, extremely low power state to the point where it can heat water on its own through fission. This is a standard term in the nuclear power industry, and this confusion seems like one more reason reactors should not exist in an unregulated venture capital environment.