Star Trek: Voyager S2E23 “The Thaw”

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Strong disagree. There’s no reason why sufficiently advanced AI couldn’t replace brain function. Note this is ACTUAL AI, not LLMs, which are not intelligence in any way, shape, or form.

    • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Data can be pretty spooky.

      And then I saw a weird movie (“Death to Smoochy”) years prior* where his actor played kind of a gross villain and it was REAL disturbing.

      • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Brent Spiner does do a good villain. Watch Out to Sea to see him in a campier antagonistic role.

  • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I appreciate the original memes, but I could really do without the bouncing text 🙂

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Complexity isn’t relevant to my analogy.
        The lessons learned from the failures and eventual success of machine sewing are.

        Unless you’re being sarcastic.
        Sewing really is surprisingly complex.

        • Sundray@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I was being a little sarcastic 😆 . But I admit I don’t understand the analogy; what relationship does human thought have to do with human sewing?

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Sewing machines don’t make stiches the way people do. People tried for decades and failed to build machines that sewed like humans. They work by making their stiches in ways humans never would, or could realy. They had to invent a whole new way get the job done, not remotely the way a person would do it.

            AI will very likely be the same. Expecting machine minds to do things the same way a human mind would, to mimic human thought, strikes me as some kind of human centric bias.

            • Sundray@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Ah, in that case we agree! I also believe that if a genuine AI ever comes about it will be quite alien.

              • Digit@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                That’s like saying there’s no way a machine can replicate hand sewing.

                Gets me thinking there’s no way I could do sewing consistently. My adhd novelty seeking creative side (over powering my autism side) would be switching stiching types constantly, before I give up in the tedium of it. Could a machine do that?

                • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  There are sewing machines that offer didn’t stitching modes. In fact, different use cases have different optimal stitches. Like a decorative stitch can be whatever, and a hem doesn’t need to handle the same kind of forces as a join, which itself might require different strengths (like a dress shirt sleeve vs a jean’s pocket).