We live in an environment of planned obsolescence and mindless consumerism. A high quality of life can be achieved for everyone globally if we wanted to do so. Instead we sustain a system designed to extract ‘profit’ as it’s driving virtue.

  • Tinidril@midwest.socialBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The people most would advocate be removed from the population haven’t been born yet. I’m pretty sure they don’t object.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I keep trying to unpack the meaning of this in my head but I cant. What are you saying?

      • Tinidril@midwest.socialBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m saying that most people who want to reduce the population are not advocating for killing anyone. All it takes is people deciding to have one less child than they might otherwise have had. No call for volunteers necessary.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Most, fine. A powerful few who are yelling it from every tree top whilst they themselves are having multiple kids, smells like a plot to ensure that their kids inherit the earth

          • Tinidril@midwest.socialBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh, absolutely. Eugenicists absolutely exist. I wouldn’t argue otherwise. The point is that not everyone concerned about population is one. In fact, most eugenicists today are ringing the panic bell about population decline.