

So I don’t need to engage in the behavior you deride in order to be lumped into a group you define by that behavior. Did I get that right? Seems like an effective way to avoid challenging ideas, but boy are you telling on yourself.


So I don’t need to engage in the behavior you deride in order to be lumped into a group you define by that behavior. Did I get that right? Seems like an effective way to avoid challenging ideas, but boy are you telling on yourself.


My 3 year old make more sense than this though.


If she said “Trump is cancelling Thanksgiving for many families because his war in Iran is driving up grocery costs” it would have been a slam dunk.


Because there’s a monopoly on violence and they set the boundaries of that violence.


This. Politics delivers what is expedient, not what is difficult. Meaningful change starts with our culture.


I didn’t even bother down voting you my dude. You’re barking up the wrong tree to avoid hearing people call you out.


A billionaire never gave my kids free books. She was a millionaire and while she wasn’t a socialist she didn’t forget she was working class.


Sounds like job security to me


He did not get the majority of votes. He got the most votes. There is a difference and the former highlights one of the flaws in our electoral system.


The purpose of a system is what it does.


Didn’t we say the same about Twitter being bought? Running it at a loss is okay for them as long as they use it to control the markets in other ways to make a profit.


Your comment history is fun. You say the left is too easy on people yet I see all these people giving you a hard time for this post. Care to explain how you resolve that cognitive dissonance to us?


Thank you for explaining that to me and expressing how you feel.


It’s a nation of laws and if that fails we need to break the law? I can’t say I disagree on the latter but that seems to negate the former.


And that’s how our system works. Ain’t it grand?


If you want to argue then address the first three sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free internet schizo therapist.


And even if he was, it was a minority of people who voted for him. Representative democracy my ass.


We still have crime too, better defund the police


That’s a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?
This is what share holder value looks like.