riwo

capitalism either way, the only difference is if the government or the rich run it

looking at the picture, i thought they made them power lift as well ;w;

(a personal trainer doubling as dominatrix sounds actually quite effective. i wonder if people do that already)

an anarchist faq teaches about anarchist ideas, in short q&a style chapters. it exists as book but also as audiobook on yt and as podcast.

you are right! trumpism is the real working class movement!! our great president donald jeremy trump will lead the revolution and against the corrupt capitalistic elites and liberate the working class. they will establish the people’s republic of great america and bring equality and justice to the world, through socialism with american charecteristics (national socialism). the prison camps and people milita (ice) are necessairy evils, to protect the revolution!!

dengism can pack it up, it has lost all relevancy in the 21st century. trumpism is the liberation movement of our time

isreal has mandatory conscription for all jewish citizens. being former idf does not say anyone about ones politics, other than that they had the misfortune of growing up in isreal as a jewish person. i don’t think its a good criticism in itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_Israel

what makes u say this?

the food bank should be a free store / dispensery and it should stand in the place of every grocery store today <3

Capitalism is, specifically, the ability of private individuals to buy and sell companies.

The stock market is capitalist. “Venture capitalism” actually does mean capitalism. Company mergers, hostile takeovers, oligopolies, and monopolies are the direct result of the ability of private people to buy and sell companies. They are therefore capitalist.

i think this definition ignores the in my eyes far more important aspect of capitalism, that private individuals don’t just own companies, but owning companies also means they can command the workers and extract surplus value from them. so a legal classification of private property, and ownership rights.

i think without that, the definition is almost useless for criticising capitalism, because who would care, that people buy and sell companies, if they did not have power over the companies through that?

or am i missing something?

i can’t decypher the title :<

can i have an alt-text?