I’m not the one that needs to be convinced. I’m already convinced. But I’ve seen the evidence that is published today and there are many out there who have not or refuse to believe it. What we’re talking about is prosecution, the people you need to convince are our lawmakers and judges.

Hot take: If your culture is grounded in inequality then it’s not worth preserving.

… Just use a glass? AFAIK glass is reusable

What a sick shot. But you couldn’t pay me to hike that icy mountain at night.

Spoken like someone whose knowledge about the founding fathers comes entirely from his own fanfiction.

If there’s no actionable evidence then he has plausible deniability. I agree having any contact with JE should be completely taboo but that doesn’t hold in a court of law.

All of which should be states IMO.

If they care so much about my smartwatch data they could just ask nicely.

Any smoking guns? Otherwise it’s kind of a moot point.

Yeah, it’s called relapsing. I don’t recommend it.

Not if they say they keep a backup.

Good. Dems don’t back down now.

I haven’t watched spongebob in years but I can imagine their voices saying these lines perfectly. Thanks for this grade-A shit, OP.

Chuck Shumer is shaking in his AIPAC-sponsored boots rn. If he feels that it’s his job to aid Israel, well, he’s out of a job.

Not if you want to hand them out.

That’s horrifying

Good! Let’s hope she gets hit by some hardball questions that are followed by real world consequences.

If anything they’d just shut it off, killing any consciousness trapped in the simulation.

But my point is I think you underestimate the amount of people who would bw interested regardless of all the negatives.

Take a look at Meta’s social media market share; people don’t give a shit about their data.

You’re telling me that if someone invented a fountain of youth nobody would be interested?