• 0 Posts
  • 47 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 23rd, 2023

help-circle
  • michaelmrose@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldPreference
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I meant there is no particular reason to expect a gui configuration tool for a gui Window manager that isn’t expected to be dynamic to have a cli.

    Generally the use case is always maximize this window or always put it on a particular workspace etc.

    If it has any path to being addressable via bash you would check its dbus interface if any.

    The same feature on say i3wm also isn’t a CLI nor is it any more dynamic.

    Windows rules and wmctrl don’t have identical use cases although there could be overlap


  • you cannot use it via bash you configure it and it applies actions to windows as they are created you cannot use it at all where plasma isn’t your desktop and as of wayland you cannot use a different window maanager with KDE plasma as wayland doesn’t have the idea of window managers.

    I don’t think you are ever again going to have an agnostic way to do this







  • it was completely hidden under a pile of made-up conspiracy bullshit

    This is basically bullshit. I mean for ANY given thing you can imagine existing there is 5 weirdos on facebook somewhere but the substance and prevailing bitch fest as expressed by 99% of people bitching was perfectly comprehensible normal shit that you are completely retconning.








  • michaelmrose@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldPreference
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The overwhelming majority of systems consist of one monitor. For the minority on two monitors the overwhelming majority have 2 low DPI monitors or 2 high DPI monitors.

    For those with mixed DPI screens only recently has any system supported scaling xwayland apps appropriately on such setups meaning some apps look like garbage and they still do on gnome. xrandr --scale to scale per screen has worked since 2003 and per screen fractional scaling works on Cinanamon under X right now.

    To revise

    90% of everyone

    Single screen: Wayland == X Multiple similar DPI Wayland == X

    5%

    Mixed DPI with a mix of Wayland on X apps on every desktop but KDE X > Wayland

    5%

    Mixed DPI with a mix of wayland and X apps on KDE Wayland > X Mixed DPI with only wayland apps Wayland > X

    I wonder why something that is only better for 5% and worse for 5% and requires 100% to deal with bugs missing features and growing pains has negative feelings attached!




  • Wayland is 18 years old. From 2015 on people whose entire computer use was a browser and a terminal on their single screen laptop with intel integrated GPU were telling everyone else they needed to change over because X was already practically dead and wayland was ready for prime time.

    Meanwhile even on the latest and greatest everything wayland still has at that point many problems, many limitations, and is from the perspective of many users not better in any way whatsoever and in many ways worse. Continue this for 11 years. By the time everything is ready for prime time you’ve already primed people to reject and dislike you.



  • our shit wouldn’t be as cheap however and nothing is stopping people from building enough housing save the desire to keep prices artificially high. Lacking demand they could have just built less to maximize their gain. Given more demand yet they could have built more but little enough to again maximize gain. Seeing a pattern here?