mathemachristian[he]

I think that’s a fair take if you mean that the Iranian people lead the revolution and outside help is only permitted if it works directly under the command of the iranian people. The reason people are so on edge about this is because there is a lot of US state dept propaganda about “liberating” the country, trodding out some opposition group regardless of popularity that is willing to work with the US regime. See for example VZ and machado as the latest example.

well idk why all these people call it independence war, revolutionary war then but I don’t really care about these semantics. To most people a war is a systematic, organized application of lethal violence between two or more parties over control of a piece of land and it’s population. This can be for oppression or liberation. If you have a different definition than most than alright, but I’m not “victim blaming” for going by the definition most people use (including those fighting it) that’s ridiculous lol.

really any war fought against colonisation… Imagine if the chinese people hadn’t fought against imperialism, or the russian people against tsarism

If raising an army and establishing a nation to fight another army defending it’s nation is not what war is then I don’t know what your definition is

I don’t see who you think should do be the one to do the toppling, it’s a sincere question

Iran’s government needed toppling

by whom?

Fuck no, some wars are entirely needed like the haitian revolution, or really any war fought against colonisation… Imagine if the chinese people hadn’t fought against imperialism, or the russian people against tsarism

my relative tried sabotage and then had to do actual labor

meanwhile what happens under capitalism if your reporting threatens the system:

https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/how-the-eu-is-using-anti-russia-sanctions-to-criminalise-journalism

god damn you killed him 🔥🔥🔥

terrible shame that fedditors can’t read.