Amber Heard who is, ironically, defended for her case of domestic violence against Johnny Depp.

There’s a lot more nuance to it and both of them suck in the context of Heard vs. Depp, but she physically laid hands on Johnny Depp.

I think that’s the thing that pisses me off most. Zero accountability. Everyone is a kiss ass to Trump and although the law exists, no one is upholding it.

Seems like she’s unfit to do her job too. Get her out of there like Kristi Noem.

The act of being arrested is not particularly fun. You know, being restrained and walked off like an animal in some sense. Depends what it’s for in general. But it’s the public image of it. And then the repercussions of having to deal with follow up court work, possible jail time and it being a future talking point of a potential employer. It’s just not really something to be proud of.

That is a rule in general, with exceptions of course.

But my point stands, that the act is embarrassing enough already, especially if it’s publicized. So having your face edited to make it look even more humiliating is worse.

That is a fair definition.

Not trying to argue about anything. So I appreciate the civility.

What would you argue are the differences between rules and laws in society? I use the two interchangeably as I believe them to mean the same thing.

I’m not saying it’s perfect. It has its share of flaws, but rules and law create order. I’m not a simp for US law, but without it, injustice would run even more rampant. If you claim to love justice then you must also, by principle, be in favor of some sort of law system that enforces it.

Enforcing the law is embarrassing? Breaking the law is embarrassing.

And my point isn’t that she was necessarily breaking the law. I’m simply stating that it’s already an embarrassing enough act to be restrained and then on top of that have images of you in a vulnerable state circulate around the internet.

No I certainly would agree with that. But being restrained against your will and having your records publicized about being an offender of the law certainly doesn’t bode well for your own public image or on employment applications.

Why? It’s already embarrassing enough to be arrested

So you should just not try to defend yourself or your family, simply for the fact that they’re the authorities. Got it.

Very interesting. DOGE was supposed to get rid of these types of jobs with his campaign promise, and now they’re necessary? Huh.

Administration must be on the beach the way they flip flop.

Source: logic

That’s crazy. I never would’ve guessed. Did you also know solar panels have a theoretical limit of 33%, which is diminished even more when sunlight is further blocked? Wow! That means they’re horribly inefficient and even more so when less light comes in! Who knew! So really we’re talking about pennies on the dollar at the end of the day when something like supplying a grid at a larger level would mean nuclear.

Realistically in this situation are you legally justified in shooting if they barge into your home without a warrant? Save you survive the wall of gunfire they will inevitably deliver, will you have legs in court to stand on or are you fucked regardless for engaging with federal authorities?

(Let’s assume a state that has castle doctrine)

I wholeheartedly agree with that. Doesn’t seem like anyone is though unfortunately.

That is excellent and cost effective, however what then when there’s no sun out or it’s cloudy? Will you not travel?

Wind turbines can’t meet the energy demand of the infrastructure unfortunately. Nuclear is the most feasible option however, with the exception of France, no country has really committed to an energy source that can adequately support charging all these batteries albeit oil, natural gas, renewable energy etc. Oil and natural gas still continue to be the cheapest

Right. And how many countries currently use or are planning to use this In a large scale capacity besides France? Oh yea.

No need to be a dickhead.

Not that Trump is right but, how will we charge said batteries…?