dreamy (she/her)

Do you have any pictures of it?

Ah, yes. Maladaptive daydreaming 🥰

I kinda enjoy it too, but Rudeus is just such a pos, and the writer probably is as well. I was so happy that we were getting nice, non-fetishistic Eris-focused episodes for the new season, but as of episode 3 we’re back to square one with this person 🤦‍♀️.

Edit:

…but that show I probably fast forward scenes more than any other…

Glad I’m not alone in this :D

lmao 😭

The study I linked is self-reported inclination. I think more data can be collected that way.

This is a false equivalency. Pedophile doesn’t mean someone that rapes children. A pedophile is someone that’s sexually attracted to children. Someone that rapes children is called a child rapist. You can be a pedophile that recognizes their urges being bad and thus not act upon them/get psychological help. This is why your analogy fails.

What we know is that there is no direct implication between consuming this content and engaging in criminal activity.

I know, I’m not for banning the content either. Let it stay as the nicotine patch that it is, until evidence comes out showing that it does increase child sexual assault.

It’d seem that there isn’t really that much research in this area. This is the only article I could find directly related to child SA, with a helpful conclusion:

In this work, we have established how people with attractions to children are seeking sexual satisfaction using a range of different forms of FSM depicting children. We found no evidence that engaging with sexual fantasy and various forms of FSM was associated with variance in self-reported willingness to engage in sexual offences involving children, despite substantial numbers in our sample expressing a willingness to engage in these behaviours. Instead, we found that those who were more sexually satisfied reported a lower level of willingness to engage in such behaviours, while those who held offence-supportive beliefs reported a higher willingness. We urge researchers and clinicians to use our work as a springboard for further studies on the pursuit of sexual satisfaction, the addressing of sexual frustration. All of this should be conducted within the context of reducing potential risk, while encouraging a more evidence-informed social conversation about the importance of sexuality considerations in this area.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19419899.2026.2619511#d1e4039

Though I think that banning lolicon drawings would just make pedophiles go and consume actual child pornography, which is arguably worse.

Yeah, it is.

I think doing this with Kutub al-Sittah would be way more interesting. Everybody knows what’s in the Quran, it’s the shortest of the three books. But not many people know that it’s sunnah to make your child bride wash your semen riddled clothes:

Some people are weird as hell 😭

Who are they?

He looked much younger not too long ago. The young people’s blood he keeps sucking seem to not be working too well for him.

You can open your right-wing cesspool instance any day you want if you don’t like the main instances.

You got banned from a .ml community, I’d just block their political communities and move on.

Wireguard isn’t what matters. What matters is how much personal data the VPN company collects and how they handle that personal data. In Mullvad’s case, they don’t need any personal information to sign up (you just generate an account number and can then pay via cash/monero for anonymity), and they don’t get any personal information when you use the service either as their servers are RAM-only so they can’t log anything.

Lmao, I saw their website before and really thought that they had built something new.

We have Pardus as well, which just turned out to be an Ubuntu reskin.

No, LTT did in-video edits. They called them out because they had insane errors that could’ve been easily caught during editing in the first place, and their “fixes” were sometimes very unnoticeable by the viewer (just small text on the bottom correcting the information etc.).

You misunderstand me. The negative emotions associated with transgender identity is the mental illness.

Do you think that everyone has the same amount of attention span that you do? You realize that we can scroll up to see your original reply where you say that mental illness is characterized by “an abnormal brain” right?

Trans people having negative emotions isn’t because of societal acceptance, it’s the opposite. The issue arises when people disregard trans people’s experiences and call them “mentally ill”, and even refuse care proven to work on the basis of calling them mentally ill.

Sorry I infringed on your right to call me “he” lmao.

Words have absolutely no meaning.

That’s not what I said, that’s just what you want me to say. Women are women and men are men. Actual is meaningless here.

I never said that trans women were “a male that feels like a female”, I said that their gender is incongruent with their sex, and you agreed with it. Gender and sex aren’t the same phenomenon. Gender refers to the typical psychological and sociocultural traits that are usually congruent with one’s sex, while sex refers to strictly to one’s biology.

Cis women may also have XY chromosomes (XY gonadal dysgenesis) and internal testes. Discarding other primary and secondary sexual characteristics just to disregard trans people just makes you seem more ignorant.

It isn’t identical, but it is analogous.

Wanting you to not be a douchebag isn’t analogous to wanting you to accept their religion.

Appeal to authority and also false. It isn’t a settled topic. Plenty of biologists still hold that the male/female distinction on a biological basis is useful. Even if some people confuse sex and gender.

😂 Addressing the scientific consensus isn’t appeal to authority. I’m not saying “This person is a doctor so they must be right” I’m pointing to the consensus of WMA which is a gigantic WHO-partnered organization. The same is also visible for the majority of major medical organizations in the U.S.

Plenty of biologists also hold the view that evolution isn’t real, and that doesn’t affect the consensus. This issue was also mostly settled already before it became a political point.

And nobody is saying that we should get rid of the male/female distinction.

Correct. Which in no way means that we need to acknowledge that they are anything other than what they were born as.

Disregarding the fact that this statement doesn’t disagree with my point, I hope you’re not as stupid as to not see this entailing calling grown-ass people babies.

It is what the study found. I didn’t say anything about it being shifted towards either end of a spectrum, I said that it seems to have a neuroanatomical component.

Sexual orientation also has a neuroanatomic component to it, or an “abnormal brain” if we use your words. Do you think that homosexual people are also mentally ill, or that that is just natural human diversity. Because that would be a weird double-standard.

“Actual woman” is meaningless. If their gender is incongruent with their sex and they are male, it follows logically that they are women. There are also arguments about medically transitioned trans people being the opposite of their sex assigned at birth, as they come to fit the sexual characteristics of their gender identity.

I’m not aware of any laws making it illegal to misgender someone, and even if I grant you that it still isn’t comparable at all. Preferred pronouns aren’t the same as “God’s chosen people”. The latter implies that a God that watches you masturbate in your room exists, while the former only has you acknowledge what has already been acknowledged by the best medical professionals in the world, of which I suppose you see yourself smarter than.

Trans women aren’t “born men”. A baby isn’t a man. They were born male and they found out their gender identity to be incongruent with their sex later in life.