Lmao in one sentence you perfectly exposed why anarchists hate MLs. Aside from all the historical bs, anarchists are just expected to go along with ML because it’s “better than capitalism”, but you’ll never see any ML giving any ground to anarchists.

Ironically that makes you quite similar to liberals, who always want the left to support them but never give any ground :)

Personally, I can fight more than one thing at a time. But since you don’t think that’s possible, why are you more focused on fighting anarchists in your comment than capitalism? Is this projection? Are you a liberal? 🤔

All of you are projecting so fucking hard LMAO. Second terminally online person that tells me to get a life.

Look at your account age and your number of comments. Then look at mine. You have a problem, you fucking loser.

Fuck you for defending an animal abuser. He literally showed the collar on stream – DAYS AFTER PEOPLE WERE CALLING HIM OUT - and it was an electrical collar with black tape over the prongs, which he claimed to be a “vibrating colar”.

You are fucking scum. Fuck you and your cult of animal abusers and defenders.

Didn’t know about that. That’s… Certainly something. Like I knew about stuff she said and believed, but had no clue it ever got to that point.

Anyway, purely on the discussion of word choice and the psychology behind it, I’m still not sure sure if that would classify as misogyny. I assume she posted that picture because she saw it as “proof” (in her eyes) that that person was a man. So, from her point of view, the hate is being directed towards men and not women. Even if they are women from our POV, the hate is really coming from a place of hate towards men IMO, or at least what they see as unmanly men. If it was mainly stemming from a hate of women, I imagine a lot more of them would target trans men instead.

Oh, another deflection. How surprising.

Do you have anything of value to say? I guess it’s not hard to get to 2.4k comments in 3 months when it’s all completely worthless and void of any substance. I guess we must all find meaning somewhere, but I hope you find s better place. And that you stop defending animal abusers.

Edit: also .ml user LOL, I hadn’t even been looking at people instances until now, but not surprised.

Your account is 3 months old and you have 2.4k comments.

I’ve been here over 3 years with less than 500.

Lol

Yes, I’ve had dogs all my life including large ones. I don’t have time to keep writing the same thing, so here’s a copy paste from another comment of mine:

So we know she’s wearing an electrical collar, we know he is lying about it, we know there are more similar moments on stream, and we have the past history of Hasan pulling a dogs tail… So why would you believe him about the claw? The only reason to believe it’s the claw is because he said so. But we already know he is a liar, and showed complete disregard for her and didn’t even check on her.

Removed by mod

There’s no “except”. You’re not vegan.

No, it’s not. Answer my catholic priests question. Plenty of them are saying to love thy neighbour, the Pope has also spoken in support of Gaza and Ukraine. So how do you feel about pedophila in the church?

Right back act ya.

1. You’re the one who brought it up mate, don’t try to gotcha me with “back at ya” when that’s what I’m doing to you lmao

2. Reading is a useful skill. As I said, that time is being spent by me to call out an animal abuser; it’s being spent by you to defend an animal abuser.

Sure, fuck em, but at least they have the excuse of cognitive dissonance and being raised to see farm animals as meat. Most people don’t even think of the animal as they eat the meat, and at least something is gained by eating. None of that can be used as an excuse for Hasan to abuse his dog.

But you’re not even denying the abuse anymore, just trying to deflect onto other things to protect your beloved abuser. So fuck off. I’m blocking you; feel free to use your time to do all the things you think I should be doing with mine instead.

Removed by mod

I am vegan, first off, so sorry to burst your bubble. But you’re clearly not a vegan if you’re defending a dog abuser. Being vegan is an ideal that goes beyond not consuming animal products. Imagine being a vegan and sitting here defending that fucking dude.

I do care about Gaza, but this isn’t about that and I can care about more than one thing. How do you feel about pedophila in the Catholic church? They also raise a lot of money and help a lot of people in need. I guess in your book that offsets. No one is black and white; but I’m not going to sit here and defend animal abuse.

If you pick and chose when to have morals and care, you don’t really have any morals. You’re just roleplaying. So fuck off, scum, for defending an animal abuser. The time you’ve spent here could also have been spent on helping Gaza in some way, but you are actively choosing to defend an animal abuser. If you don’t care about him you could have ignored my comments and just moved on to something you do care about. But you made the conscious decision to stop here and waste time defending an animal abuser. All the things you say about me could be thrown back at you; the difference is that I’m calling out animal abuse while you defend it. So, once and for all, fuck you.

Because unfortunately people are similar everywhere. People here think they are smarter than right wingers because they believe different things, but they only believe different things because that’s what they were taught/told to believe. A lot of them are also chronically online and desperately want somewhere to belong to; that’s how cults form as well.

Put all that together and you have people defending an animal abuser just because he’s politically aligned and the figure head of a community they belong to - cult.

Removed by mod

Just because a dog does not yelp that doesn’t make ok nor should we down play it. Excuse while I grab and pull my gf by the arm, slap her even maybe, as long as she doesn’t scream or cry it’s ok…

Also, the claw thing is absolute bs. There are multiple moments which play out the exact same as that one, but where she doesn’t yelp. She goes to move away/is standing off the bed; Hasan reaches behind the camera; she suddenly goes back to her spot. In some she moves as soon as she sees him moving his arm. What do you think is happening? Not to mention, after denying the use of an electric collar but refusing to show it, he later (on a different day) went on stream to show the collar and said it was “vibration only”, but you can clearly see there’s black tape on it over where the prongs would be.

So we know she’s wearing an electrical collar, we know he is lying about it, we know there are more similar moments on stream, and we have the past history of Hasan pulling a dogs tail… So why would you believe him about the claw? The only reason to believe it’s the claw is because he said so. But we already know he is a liar, and showed complete disregard for her and didn’t even check on her.

Removed by mod

My brother cultist in Christ, all the clips I mentioned were available on his channel as were the vods. Maybe they’ve been removed by now, but that is where I saw them. I literally used to be a Hasan viewer. You are in a cult.

I’ve thought about this before, but don’t see it as misogyny. After all, they don’t see MTF as women. I think it has something in common with gay men receiving more hate and being bigger victims of violence than lesbian women. Maybe it does have something to do with rejecting traditional masculinity - which can be related to misogyny, but is a separate thing.

🙄 Go on, tell us who “you people” are then.

You don’t have to be it with me, but be intellectually honest with yourself for just a minute. Pretend we are talking about a right wing influencer.

You can see him, multiple times, reach for something off screen and his dog suddenly going back into place. There is a video of it happening and his dog suddenly yelping, which is what started this. He has literally shown the collar on cam (days after) but with tape over it. He has literally been caught lying multiple times.

Would you still defend the guy? Be honest with yourself.

Even if you don’t want to believe he uses a shock collar, his treatment of her is still deplorable. He keeps the dog as a prop on Stream for hours on end. When she moves out of bed he will throw a hissy fit. He has even complained about her roaming around “like a cow”. He only started letting her be more free after the controversy started. His guests have even mentioned her collar being too tight in the past.

Stop defending this dude.

Edit: I’ll also add this (older) video of him with his dog Fish:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FT8ucadGCVc

That is something he did blatantly on camera.

Yes, he did. It’s blatantly obvious. Stop covering for an animal abuser just because you’re aligned politically.

There’s also this older moment:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FT8ucadGCVc

This is the type of shit that makes the left looks ridiculous. He does zap his dog. He has literally shown the collar on cam (days after) but showing it has tape over it. He has literally been caught lying multiple times. You can see him, multiple times, reach for something off screen and his dog suddenly going back into place. There is a video of it happening and his dog suddenly yelping, which is what started this. “Her claw got caught”: 1. Do you wish to buy a bridge? 2. He still barely gave a fuck, which is condemnable regardless. He also used to complain about his dog moving around before the “incident”, instead of just laying in one spot.

Just because someone is a leftist it does not mean you should cover for them. That is cult like behaviour. Fuck Hasan, fuck animal abusers, and fuck people covering for animal abusers just because they are aligned politically.

Edit: There’s also this older moment:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FT8ucadGCVc