New account, being obnoxious with all caps and emoji spam to make a contrarian argument. This is definitely intentional ragebait

The second-biggest cryptocurrency split in two becaue some people just decided to undo transactions. The transactions were absolutely theft, but the point is that some people just decided to change what the ledger said.

Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYRVezF5-hk

Edit: apologies for the double reply, I didn’t notice that it was you asking both times. I’ve left more details in the other one

The real video does exist, LBC just uploaded the wrong one. They corrected it in a matter of hours. Here’s the actual one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYRVezF5-hk

The interview with the housing secretary was also re-uploaded with the correct title and description

Who cares? How do you even know that people didn’t watch the video?

Because if they had watched it, they would know that it was not actually about Epstein or Russia

Have you seen anything about the reports at all?

I literally wrote “I do not doubt Israel’s involvement. I think it’s silly to argue that other countries can’t also be involved” in this post

Headlines were invented to get attention for a story, not to replace it. Otherwise, nobody would bother to write an article (or in this case conduct an interview) under the headline

The actual video has the MI6 guy bring up Israel’s involvement as well. If these were actual people making assumptions off of headlines, they would never have found out

But no, I don’t think that every single commenter is an actual person who just made an assumption, commented, and left without even pressing play on the video

Edit: almost every single commenter. Shout out to the one talking about Trump shitting himself instead. Still should have pressed play, but at least it was funny

Whether it was Russia or Israel really isn’t the point here

If that was the case, would they not just put the correct video back instead of taking it down altogether and uploading the correct one separately? I don’t know if you actually can replace the video file on a youtube upload. I know there are some limited editing tools that can be used to cut a segment out, but that wouldn’t explain this

As in LBC posted the wrong video intentionally?

40 miles per charge, for those that haven’t read it. That’s enough for a return trip on a whole lot of ferry journeys, though. Certainly a good chunk of the major ones where I am

An electric hydrofoil ferry, no less!

The only people that would go see this are Trump cultists, who are going to approve of it regardless of quality

Its official budget was $40 million (presumably before marketing), so I’m not sure that this can be called a hit on an $8 million box office

We can call it Big Max though

It is, genuinely, in the Geneva Conventions that nobody should use the red cross except for to designate medical staff and establishments that are protected under the conventions. The idea is to make sure that there is absolutely never any doubt that that symbol means anything else in order to minimise the risk to those people