Yes, I definitely had a long term strategy when posting an internet comment.

But please do elaborate what my “stance on general purpose computing” is? Genuinely curious.

My feeling is you’re pro general purpose computing and against censorship. Which is why it’s strange to see you make fun of a provider for not censoring their product enough. I was referring only to that part of the article.

I see your stand from the comment above though, I’m not going to argue that. Peace.

There wasn’t, but it’s not the first article you wrote that I read, and I know your stance on general purpose computing. Why is a general purpose language model somehow a bigger problem?

Modern CPUs can downmix and compress audio without a sweat, it doesn’t need to be done by the studio.

that is so hilariously unsafe that its guardrails can be subverted by a tactic a 13-year-old uses when they want to prank-call someone. And that Anthropic refuses to take responsibility for that unsafe product.

We should ban general computing too, it’s scary how unsafe these things are!

What’s the joke or the message here? I genuinely only see 4 panels about how a girl has put a ribbon on her dog

Nice - but it’s a pretty crowded space between Zeronet and IPFS and possibly others. And even these well-known ones barely see any serious use. And these projects have been promoted pretty heavily. You need fanatical users ;)

What are you creating?

How do you imagine Debian maintains that huge repository? Corporate office workers with nicely trimmed beards and expensive suits sitting in air conditioned Debian HQ?