

Isn’t there a legally important conflict of interest here? The investigation is against an officer of ICE, given immunity by the Executive Branch. An investigation is only trustworthy, at least a bit, if handled by an outside investigator.
Decentralise everything!


Isn’t there a legally important conflict of interest here? The investigation is against an officer of ICE, given immunity by the Executive Branch. An investigation is only trustworthy, at least a bit, if handled by an outside investigator.
Perhaps it is naive, but I think the point here was that the police, technically and legally speaking, are much more restricted. As flawed as it is both legally and in actuality, police is still way more restricted and accountable than ICE is both legally and in actuality.


It’s crazy that the line between good and evil is getting comically obvious: the David vs the Goliath, the weak vs the strong, the murdered vs the murdurers, the (bulk) of the people vs the elite.
Oh well. I was hoping to read it. But I believe you. There was a time when I would never believe stupidity like that can exist. But this is a different timeline.


“… and new to the city.” Aha! She was an immigrant!
The title first read to me: Leaders alarmed at how fair the investigation is (I.e. they want it to be unfair)