rofl no. No, an RO system will not add more plastic to your water than the MILES of pipeline your city water went through to reach your house, or even the MANY feet of plastic pipe that sit in modern walls… Your ignorance is pathetic, and not in any way that you should be proud of.
Why make the distinction? Exactly! They made no distinction, except for adding the token…
While my example was warning against cliche extremes, you point at the exact other end of tokenization that exists in droves in modern media. Vapid, stupid, uncreative, and pointless “representation” that does nothing but assuage the ignorant and inflame the opposition.
Nawww I totally meant what I said. Unfortunately for those that disagree who cannot read English, I explained a basic function with plenty of ‘ifs’ involved, so… good luck proving me wrong!!
He’s not always the most in-depth, and his reviews can miss some important usability metrics, but he’s excellent for showing his work. If you want good A/B reviews, I’d be hard pressed to not recommend him. Just mind that some of the items he shows aren’t going to be as easy as they look to use.
(my opinion came from my experience, so I won’t be shocked if his tests disagree, but he’s still a good recommendation for a huge variety of goods) EG: Some of these glues really suck at adhering to certain surfaces, so it really can be a case by case basis as to which is absolutely best.
Nope. Purely wrong. The answer to the paradox of tolerance is to only use violence in defense.
Yes, that is also a grey zone to many perspectives, but things rapidly become clear if you expand the scope of the question… For an example: Trump’s ignorant, braindead policies on immigration and “sanctuary cities” DOES make sense … if you’re an isolated dipshit desperately trying to climb the unfair social ladder Trump and his ilk constructed… Though if you expand it to the scope of humanity and all the gains we see when people (let alone disparate cultures) work together, his policies are a HUGE loss.
Spoilers: If someone wants to go out of their way to kill someone who will only get violent in defense, that means that they want to ATTACK those people.
Oh I enjoy a good BBQ, but the sheer emphasis many put on them is… really weird.
I think many who would downvote me conflate the social aspects with the “BBQ” part. Just throw a damn party! I don’t care what you cook but the point is it doesn’t NEED to include one of the most wasteful and silly forms of cooking.
Again, not bashing BBQ as an actual cooking practice: A BBQ house restaurant is a beautiful thing if they’re not fucking it up. Though that doesn’t mean every John Doe needs a BBQ in their back yard for a party! It’s about how weirdly popular they are in the US.
The correct answer to someone who will not stop violence is to violently end them.
No, it’s not pretty. No, it’s not comfortable. No, it’s not easy to do so while retaining the optics of the moral high ground. Yet that is the only answer that actually works.
Naww I actually fully agree with the idea that it could (and should) work in an ideal world. Just that such a plan would still definitely come with some intrinsic cost/effort, even beyond keeping the shed a viable shed.
Also, people DO have access to chainsaws, so if you’re afraid of loons getting chainsaws… you might just be a bigger coward than you are smart…
12·26 days ago
12·26 days ago
1·26 days ago
lol have fun on your moral high ground while the world dies around you.