That says “proposed” - not implemented, though?

And if it’s under Trump’s administration, I can’t take anything like that as any indication of reason or sustainability.

Trump is part of crime.

“can’t be traced” - it’s a public blockchain, though. Everyone can see and trace transactions.

When the money source is clear - it’s the shipping companies - you can trace their transactions.

Is it a war crime to attack the military leader? I kind of doubt that. Military targets are fine under international law.

Could the US have vetoed the whole process, and no vote would have taken place? Or what does this differentiation mean?

What kind of measures do current Denuvo versions take that they need these kinds of bypasses?

Laughing is very healthy. You’re doing great!

What makes you think the second number is not a no vote?

In 2021 they published reasoning with they will vote no.

I tried to find a definite source, unfortunately there’s no immediate discoverability or reference. Gemini claims “The Standard Format: [Yes] - [No] - [Abstentions]”.

My understanding, or assumption from considering classic physical goods, is that if you buy the digital product you may be able to resell it, but if you license it it’s not buying and you don’t own a product you can resell.

If GoG licenses you a product you can download and can archive, then it’s not bought and may not be resellable. (?)

Who manages the access, who platforms, and serves the NFT content?

If it’s up to the store to do so, you don’t need NFT for that. The store can already do that.

Ballistic.NG

Invalid weblink, so I’ll link the store page for BallisticNG, for anyone else who wants to take a peek

Ok, I’ll start removing the batteries instead and place it where it was then.

Overall production != local availability or accessibility

I’m confused. Excel is a spreadsheet, that’s always in the form of a table.

You can’t trust Palantir with any agreements, safeguards, or supposedly deidentified or anonymized data. They will use the data anyway, undisclosed. Immoral data is their business. Data association and connection is their business. And they have the scope, prevalence, and collected data for it.

Hospitals had Palantir? Wtf

“Leaderboard” where rank one scores 0.3% success lol

I find it unlikely to be about security. Either it is about control or about money (pressure to induce bribery for lifting), or a combination of both.

All it needs is a bribe from Cisco, and it’s no problem anymore. Probably.

If I were a network packet, I would get very confused by so much routing.

If we see a reversal of the policy soon then it was a standard playbook policy announcement to receive corrupt bribery money from some big manufacturers and importers. If we don’t, it may very well have been with no takers anyway.

We’ve seen it plenty before (within the last year). Like tarrifs, then exclusions, etc.