

Wow for once there actually was a “good guy with a gun”. Probably not a great strategy anyway, because the death toll is too high still.
Very fucking sad case. 16 year old shooter and he picks an elementary school of all things? Fuck.


Wow for once there actually was a “good guy with a gun”. Probably not a great strategy anyway, because the death toll is too high still.
Very fucking sad case. 16 year old shooter and he picks an elementary school of all things? Fuck.
From home mostly. Sometimes from public transport, or the shitter at work.


No, it didn’t “use” data.


We need a third panel with
How “edit /etc/selinux/config and set SELINUX=permissive” looks at me at 2:30 a.m. once chmod is done with me.


Yeah at the time I had a Radeon HD 5850, which I think was a decent price-value balance, and that had 1GB.
I thought for uber eats the “tip” was a bribe or bounty you have to add to your order ahead of time to ensure it even gets picked up?
Yeah, a table-top turn-based battle simulator. The units have ranges of movement and of fire and line of sight matters. People build interesting terrains and then pit armies of similar strength (I think by using a point buy system) against each other.
I played a round using a friend’s sister’s army against him and his once. I think his sister’s army was from the Imperial Army. I’m sure he had T’au, because I remember his Kroot fucked me up with their movement speed, or maybe a wood bonus, something like that. The game was not bad, but didn’t capture me either.


I wonder how that layout even happens. Are rails and highways planned together?
I guess here in Switzerland the rail lines are mostly much older than the highways, and that’s why this doesn’t feel familiar


The math is a bit counter intuitive, but increasing by 5% then decreasing by 5% of the new value does not get you back to the start exactly.
You take a value v, increase it by 5% to 105% of the previous you now have 105% * v. Now you take that new values as the basis for the next calculation, and decrease by 5% to 95% of the previous, you now have 95% * 105% * v which is actually 99.75% * v.
You need to find the day from which their wealth increased by 5.263% so that a 5% tax would bring them back.
But yeah, whatever it doesn’t make a material difference to the argument. A one time tax sounds a bit weird to me, but I don’t live there, Californians should do whatever they can. Maybe a one time tax is a good first domino stone.


Yeah there are such limits sometimes, but they write that it didn’t leave the house network, so they knew better when they made the title… I don’t know just seems like clickbait.


For that the unit is wrong.


The title of that text makes no sense.


Yeah but not all of them are rectently made up by an individual person for the purpose of being posted here in order to mislead others about word that are in practical use.
lol, really? That’s a perfect demonstration then.
The word is a name of a town in the United Kingdom, and contains the vulgar word for female genitals / the friendly Australian greeting as a substring.


Nice try, law firm trying to learn our tricks.


Not that I am aware of, sorry.
All the words posted before by the others in the thread are made up, and some of them aren’t even good at pretending to be German.


I don’t think this is comparable to descriptivism and prescriptivism in linguistics.
The predictive power of a classification doesn’t have anything to do chronological order of what you are now and how you will develop, but about if knowing one thing (the MBTI) allows to deduce another (age, socioeconomic status, interests, vocational suitability, whatever). In other words predictive power is about correlations and testable outcomes.
If a psychological test leads to a result that does not predict other statistical values about a person, it does not actually capture anything that person is, at least nothing that’s verifiable or falsifiable.
And if it’s not verifiable or falsifiable we might as well use zodiac signs.


lol that’s so stupid.
And the Myers-Briggs isn’t even a good one. Those two ladies just made it the fuck up during World War 2, based on some Carl Jung book. It has no predictive power.
Doesn’t really look much better if you look at the week though. +4.5% in after market trading, then it all wiped out the next day.