I agree with the sentiment, but purchasing a photo of oppressed people enjoying a small comfort in the middle of a destroyed city feels real bad.
A bleak time for the concept of humanity.
I agree with the sentiment, but purchasing a photo of oppressed people enjoying a small comfort in the middle of a destroyed city feels real bad.
A bleak time for the concept of humanity.
Clicking on the link and having it advertise “Licensable Picture” gives off an even more dystopic aura, and makes it all that much worse.


Doomerism: These disphits should have never supported him in the first place.
Hoperism: Time’s arrow marches ever forward and here’s hoping this lesson stick with Americans and brings about meaningful change.
——————————————
Reads article -
Initial reaction: Doomerism
Subsequent reaction after some thought and soul-searching: Hoperism


You have more faith in Kentucky than it deserves.


This comment contexualizes Meta‘s propaganda about AI, which the article doesn’t do. Mentioning Meta‘s AI blitz along with the secretive nature of this would have strengthened the article IMO.
Appreciated.


The article clearly says very little, except this:
But what Meta did with all this data is unclear.
No shit Zuck doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. The point is this article says very little and reads like a Fox News quality fear piece. Futurism is better than that.


This seems like it’s Meta testing the boundaries of contemporary chatbots so they can refine their stuff so they don’t continually get sued. Given the absurdness of modernity, where people are using these bots in-lieu of other social interactions, this seems like a worthwhile stress test. Assuming they share the findings and don’t sell them which is likely asking too much of a corp.
This article, and especially the headline, seems like it’s fearmongering without substance. It’s like the headlines from anti-science tabloids describing an research article in the most biased terms possible. Thus, this article leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Am I missing something?
Edit: related article(https://www.engadget.com/2209332/meta-is-facing-1-4-trillion-in-state-lawsuits-over-social-media-addiction/)
Another reason to discredit Southern Baptists


The final statement about “God” putting someone in to help them has got to be the dumbest cope I’ve ever seen. Truly gives the word “hope” a bad name.
They have multiple options presented to them and are too stupid to try something else, despite seeing direct effects of nearly unilateral decisions Trump’s made that fuck them over.
These are the type of people that will reject a state certified doctor because “God” will provide a healer for them, completely missing the irony.


Trump abandoned a legitimate Kurdish military force to the dipshit Turks during his first term. I agree with you that anyone talking about the Kurds fighting in any meaningful capacity in this conflict is delusional.


Clearly, but the upfront cost of an EV is out of the question for me atm.


*cries sitting in my 15 year-old car
Basically the Socratic method


Genetic disorders from high inbreeding should not be the reason we hate the IDF.
We should hate the IDF for committing genocide against fellow humans, regardless of genetics.
You didn’t comprehend what I wrote.
You disagree with what? That this is a bleak time for the concept of humanity?