Yes these laws are absolutely absurd

Plus “clunky” bifocals have way fewer moving parts and can be made with thin wire frames so they’re lighter.

As someone with clunky bifocals, the weight of the frame (even the chunky ones) is absolutely unnoticeable compared to the weight of the lenses. You don’t get thin wireframes for the lower weight, you get it because they’re less noticeable visually.

Unless you stop at a coffee shop

Now they also have you on camera

Well gecko > locust, so all I’m hearing is a happy story of how you fed a nice little gecko with a gross locust.

I’ve heard of locking/freezing accounts, but the only case where a person got identified (that I’ve heard of) was because the user used their apple ID mail for recovery and got identified that way from the information handed over.

I’m not sure I understand why a large multinational company having multiple studios is a special level of “fuck you” to employees?

My bad, didn’t notice the different username

Just drop it (both of you)…at this point you’re just a sea lion and a troll exchanging messages.

Ingogni is super suspicious and I don’t believe what they claim to do is even possible. But to me it’s what they claim to do that makes them suspicious, and that’s and entirely different thing than what proton does, and at least proton has documented audits to back up their privacy claims. INB4 the links to articles talking about proton complying with law enforcement requests, every company does that, even respected ones like mullvad. It’s not important that they hand over information they’re legally required to, it’s important that they save as little as possible so they can hand over everything without identifying you.

And also, any privacy conscious service is never better than your own opsec, so if you get caught because your recovery email was your apple ID, that’s on you and not them.

Hating cops and being racist is not mutually exclusive though

These laws specifically create liability for a person who serves a drink to a person who is obviously intoxicated. In a bar.

My point exactly! This is a function of being drunk and how a person acts. It has nothing to do with how much they buy. Come in and drop 100k (hyperbolic number) in “rounds for everybody!” Without drinking anythijg yourself and they’ll never throw you out or cut you off.

“Over serving” laws let’s them cut you off for being too drunk, not for buying too much.

They will never cut you off for “buying too much”, it’s always related to their behavior and never the fact they purchase a lot.

“Analog AI”

They don’t kick you out for buying too much though…they kick you out because you’re an asshole who is annoying everyone else or outright endangering them.

I mean, that’s pretty on par for other manufacturers, rule of thumb is about half of rated range during winter. It’s not really the manufactures fault that part, the WLTP standard they have to use is just using a way too high percentage of steady-speed city driving to give a good idea of real-world usage for most people.

It’s a really low price, but it’s also an incredibly shitty car with terrible safety scores.

Careful! They might will give you clamydia!