Interesting article, and one I am sympathetic to, but the inclusion of “Western” (and democratic, to a lesser extent) alongside educated, industrialized, and rich when transitioning from talking about a “lack of sanitation” to “adequate sewage disposal” was kinda… jarring?
Other cultures may not have the same type of porcelain thrones we use, but I think the EIR parts still have effective plumbing, even without being WD. Or do they just not have any of the same issues and pressures around public toilets?
I think your last paragraph is really the crux of it. Technically, I’d agree with the statement “service [vs ‘support’?] animals should be reserved for those who need them”, except that I don’t think anyone can really define what “need” and “service” mean (or even “animal” and “reserved” really); I don’t think I’d agree with anyone who is actually using that statement in their line of arguments either. Competing needs can be a hard, or even impossible, problem to practically solve, but trying to find a global answer or rule for who gets precedence isn’t gonna be much help, which also makes it hard to regulate/legislate fairly.