

Why is this linked to an unrelated article…?
🇨🇦


Why is this linked to an unrelated article…?


Your entire fucking government is worthless; burn it all down and re-build.


If you have a static IP address, you can just use A records for each subdomain you want to use and not really worry about it.
If you do not have a static IP address, you may want to use one single A record, usually your base domain (example.com), then CNAME records for each of your subdomains.
A CNAME record is used to point one name at another name, in this case your base domain. This way, when your IP address changes, you only have to change the one A record and all the CNAME records will point at that new IP as well.
Example:
A example.com 1.2.3.4
CNAME sub1.example.com example.com
CNAME sub2.example.com example.com
You’d then use a tool like ACME.sh to automatically update that single A record when your IP changes.
I think it’s even bigger than that. It seems this particular law allows pulling the Feds in as well, bypassing their immunity.
In this case, the ACLU’s attorneys argue that federal officers worked closely with the county sheriff and city police officers to terrorize families at the racetrack raid, and were therefore part of a conspiracy.
Defendants in the Idaho case include officials from ICE and the FBI
Humans are just overgrown monkeys, and (at least) one of us already wrote Shakespeare’s plays on a typewriter.




Nobody breaks the law on my watch! I’m conficscating your stolen goods. Now pay your fine or it’s off to jail!
Now you can have the satisfaction of smashing it to pieces and then you get to build it, in the end you’ve got a fully constructed set and you didn’t have to build it twice.
Oh hell yeah; instant buy


I’ve had a few tv/stereos in the past that had a half mute as well. Press mute the first time and it cuts the volume in half, second press mutes completely, then third press restores full volume.


Not that I agree with that guy, but:
‘Firing a customer’ is actually a commonly used phrase/trope, meaning outright refusing to serve an individual in the future.
In Canada at least; companies can refuse service to anyone for any non-discrimintory reason, or even no reason.


I really wish these were sent as a DM automatically when a comment or post is removed.


For anyone that doesn’t want to look it up; reason for mod removal:
“reason: Anyone can fake screenshots, report it thru the DM if it’s real”


Damm, ‘free access’ however I have to create an NYT account and it’s not available on archive.org
Any mirrors?


Nice :)
Some of the managers are very nice and are happy to bend obviously stupid rules, others have a massive stick jammed deeep up inside their rectum…
The manager that hired me, re-wrote my employment contract and forged my signature on the new one, to put me as part-time instead of full time. Didn’t find out until 3mo later when I asked about my benefits package to the manager that replaced her and got confused looks/responses.


Wow. The people you meet online…


Yeah; the current system is a bit of an overreaction. Some people abuse and tracking it is work; so everyone gets punished and food gets wasted entirely instead. Stupid.


This is very much wrong, and something I’ve always disagreed with.
The reasoning behind it, is ‘conflict of interest’ (I’m just passing on the reason I was told when I worked for 7-11). The employees in the store look at a ‘product forcast’, decide how many cookies to make (heat up some pre-made dough) and package for sale. If they are permitted to keep or donate expiring product: they may intentionally make more than needed, ensuring they get free stuff. This goes for all of 7-11s ‘made in house’ (assembled as best, usually just re-heated. Fried Chicken was the closest to ‘fresh’ they sell) products. Cookies, sandwiches, hot food, etc.
I get that viewpoint; but I think they should punish abuse of the system, not outright prohibit saving perfectly good food, if nearly expiring/expired, for good causes like the needy/homeless.


Pay the court a fine, or serve your sentence.
Lawsuits require a functional legal system…