Brummbaer

Exactly, people don’t understand that an Army is formed by removing internal resistance to orders.

So basically you can point the military at to something to kill and they will do it.

Cuba was the original Epstein island under Batista.

The global crime syndicate that is capitalism never forgave the Cuban people for ending that.

She’s a Joe Rogan with a university degree.

Fun fact, according to Stirner’s widow he didn’t look like this sketch they have of him at all.

Sadly I concur, every EU country is better in that situation than Germany.

It’s a combination of AI and stupidity. If these people knew what they were doing we would either be better or worse off, it’s a gambit.

The whole mobile ecosystem is a giant hardware backdoor on every phone. I think it’s too late now to change anything on that level.

I just pointed out that it was more complicated than King + Church at the top and everyone else down the line. I wanted to be neutral here.

The idea of property was not the same as it is under capitalism or nationalism now. The feudal lords (doesn’t have to be a king - in the case of the holy roman empire for example.) have the title to the land, but it can be owned, sold or inherited down the lines by the people who hold it.

It’s not Feudalism, under Feudalism people had more property. Also common land existed. Something that disappeared completely under Capitalism.

You totally could have multiple Lords, that was nothing out of the ordinary.

Feudalism was a not some kind of top down system, it was a net woven out of relationships people negotiated all the time.

For example Enguerrand VII https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enguerrand_VII_de_Coucy

He was a vassal to the French and the English king at the same time, so the fun really begins when both are at war with another.

Bunkers only are useful if there is friendly territory behind them.

If you can’t call the police or your local warlord it’s a prison in the best case and an expensive tomb in the worst case.

Given what happend with that bar in Canberra, this won’t stay up for long.

Sorry but this whole thing is just snake-oil.

You can verify and sign your whole trust chain down to the last shared library and it doesn’t matter when you don’t know what the binary blobs on your TPM / CPU / BIOS / NIC are doing.

The only guarantee to a secure system is openness an all of that signing won’t help you there.

I don’t trust Microsoft, why should I start trusting IBM/Canonical or Poettering now.

If the possibility is there they will happily lock you out of your own hardware.

Interesting, I wonder if you could do the same now with Internet. We know that DSL works over a wet rope.