AmidFuror

They’ll have a concept of a plan within two weeks.

I believe credit for the first occurrence goes back to Ferdinand Magellan. Although he himself did not have the procedure, his crew did after his death in 1521.

This is a tricky debate, with mostly religious and traditionalist people on one side, and people against unnecessary surgical procedures on the other. Either way, I think once the foreskin is removed, it should be treated as medical waste.

Concious

Apostolic Nonce?

I still have my eye out for the return of sister-fetish dude.

https://fedia.io/m/[email protected]/t/1055567/How-do-I-deal-with-feelings-towards-my-sister-Genuine

Gotta love science reporters. “Thought to be impossible.”

“A 747 jet took off from New York’s Kennedy airport this morning, accomplishing a feat once thought to be impossible.”

This is definitely BeReady77 with a new persona back after a year of inactivity.

https://lemmy.world/post/13802343 https://lemmy.world/post/13802836 https://lemmy.world/post/15732973 https://lemmy.world/post/15756549 https://lemmy.world/post/18283806 https://lemmy.world/post/18284009

When your result breaks the laws of physics, you need to check your measurements and maths just to be sure. Better yet, have others do it for you.

Exactly. You could preface your prompt with something like this:

In answering the following questions, don’t use bullet points or emdashes, and be very concise.

And then you just paste the text from the post title and subsequent body below that. Then you make a top-level comment with ChatGPT’s output answering the poster’s questions.

Somewhere else in the comment section you could reveal your methodology.

There is no reliable way to tell whether a story was written by a human or an AI based on the final text alone. Current detection tools are inconsistent and can be wrong in both directions.

Drafts can offer some context, but they are not proof, since AI-generated text can also be produced in stages or edited to look human. Posting a draft and editing it live may demonstrate effort, but it still cannot conclusively prove authorship.

Because of this, most platforms focus on disclosure and rules about acceptable use rather than trying to definitively verify whether a text was written by a human or an AI.

I asked ChatGPT to correct your grammar, and here is what I got back. I hope it helps.

It is worth mentioning that the referenced Stack Overflow survey does not include many countries that also have excellent developers, including Russia.

I have never seriously used, do not use now, and will not use any LLM in my work, art, or research. I prefer people, communication, discovery, effort, creativity, and human art.

Meanwhile, so incredibly many developers and artists are left without attribution, respect, or gratitude. So many people atrophy their skills for learning, contribution, research, accumulation, and self-organization. So much precious human time is wasted. So much is devalued.

Time will show, and only a few who are actually accountable will probably recover. This is heartbreaking… sorrowful…

Think Incredible Hulk crossed with King Kong.

A court has demanded the Trump admin return this man, and their defense has been that they don’t have the power to do it. Now they publicly criticize a Senator for trying to get the man returned.

They really are stupid when it comes to undermining their own case, aren’t they?