Even if you do that, you don’t do it like that: You’re supposed to bully your weakest trade partners into bullying your opponents so that you don’t get dirty, you impatient fuck.

Also, we had this before and it didn’t work, both domestically and diplomatically, so this is an empty threat, you’re bluffing.

For all those receptive to their ramblings: Why is there only one of 20 military camps build by the US on Greenland occupied if this push is supposed to be about national security?

something something wild cat coffee

yeah they should issue some insulation…

You wish to improve society, yet you have an artificial vision…

People often claim that science and religion can go hand in hand

Who?

Modern discourse treats faith like a moral good.

Modern in comparison to what? What is the difference to contemporary (moral?) discourse? Also whose discourse?

Religious conflicts have claimed millions of lives

Yes, but that is a weak argument, when we are arguing for science, given that scientific discoveries have led to very significant harm as well.

It’s the inevitable result of a system that claims moral authority without accountability.

I like that phrasing.

Morality does not come from religion.

It was often the framework for morality though, because, as you said, it was or is the moral authority. Assuming no authority is total, moral progression thus was only possible through religion. I’d argue science needed/needs religion in religious societies, because science isn’t a (strong) moral framework or authority.

[Morality] comes from human empathy.

I disagree and assume it is possible through culture. The culture may be informed by empathy, but empathy without culture seems useless (that is not saying culture is rigid and the individual is not cultural and thus excused).

Joe Rogan, an intellectual.

fr though, now’s the time where even conservatives will be able to discern fascists, but conservatives will lose their media power hold very quickly once they realise the fascists and their goons will come for them too.

John Adams: Juno, Mark and Satan

MS: JUST EAT IT

Civil wars aren’t ordinary election campaigns, they mobilise different groups.

They need the heightened attention of internal conflict to mobilise against their perceived enemies. Given that the US Left seems figuratively disarmed, the fascists thus try to carry the conflict to their every doorstep by endless provocation. I don’t think the US Left can do anything to prevent being painted as the initiator of a coming conflict, so I guess they should try to set their own shareable goals apart from stealth, to survive.

Interesting analogy, but I doubt citation style and field preference are portable to social network preference, because lemmings with sociological backgrounds and tooters with technical backgrounds exist. Nevertheless, it might be a useful thought to explain the difference, between a social content aggregator and a microblogging network.

disagree

full circle