I can see how it implies all of that to someone who doesn’t have a deep enough understand of the United States senate process to understand the context clues.
My explanation was not meant as an eli5 because you didn’t ask for one.
When someone says something I don’t understand, I work to expand my understanding.
If I need someone to explain something, I ask pointed questions. I don’t make assumptions and then claim my confusion of those assumptions is someone else’s communication problem.
I stand by my claim that there are enough context clues to figure it out.
You’re claiming my explanation is inadequate. To which I can only say, I owe you nothing.
I can see how it implies all of that to someone who doesn’t have a deep enough understand of the United States senate process to understand the context clues.
My explanation was not meant as an eli5 because you didn’t ask for one.
When someone says something I don’t understand, I work to expand my understanding.
If I need someone to explain something, I ask pointed questions. I don’t make assumptions and then claim my confusion of those assumptions is someone else’s communication problem.
I stand by my claim that there are enough context clues to figure it out.
You’re claiming my explanation is inadequate. To which I can only say, I owe you nothing.
I do not claim you “owe” me anything. I’m offering feedback on your communication. You are free to reject that feedback and call me names if you want.