I can’t even think of a expletive strong enough for Musk. Like what was the final number, something like 10% of his net worth or so? Heck even if it was a whopping 50%, he’d still have more than $100bn left. How can anyone say they’re not gonna solve world hunger even tho they could. Fuck it, even if Musk had to give up all of his possessions and end up homeless, he should still do it for the greater good.
(Assuming, naively of course, you can just magically solve world hunger with a few billion dollaridoos)
Oh it wasnt magic, but it was an entire plan that probably would’ve definitely reduced world hunger greatly. But we’ll never know cause imaginary numbers matter more.
I can’t even think of a expletive strong enough for Musk. Like what was the final number, something like 10% of his net worth or so? Heck even if it was a whopping 50%, he’d still have more than $100bn left. How can anyone say they’re not gonna solve world hunger even tho they could. Fuck it, even if Musk had to give up all of his possessions and end up homeless, he should still do it for the greater good.
(Assuming, naively of course, you can just magically solve world hunger with a few billion dollaridoos)
Oh it wasnt magic, but it was an entire plan that probably would’ve definitely reduced world hunger greatly. But we’ll never know cause imaginary numbers matter more.
Yeah… well… guess we’ll have to keep rounding up our purchases if the rich ain’t gonna do shit. /s
Can we try piñata economics?
so whacking everyone who’s richer than you? that’s just anarchy but with more violence
Piñata implies it is full of something. Not everyone richer than me is full.