• Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dear Mr Rules,

    I’m not sure what motivates you to so generously offer your various dyadic tokens of knowledge on this subject without qualification while ignoring my larger point, but will assume in good faith that your thirst for knowledge rivals that of your devotion to The Rules.

    First, a question: what are conventions if not agreed upon rules? Second, here is a history of how we actually came to agree upon the aforementioned rules which you may find interesting:

    https://www.themathdoctors.org/order-of-operations-historical-caveats/

    Happy ruling to you.

    • knowledge on this subject without qualification

      I’m a Maths teacher with a Masters - thanks for asking - how about you?

      while ignoring my larger point

      You mean your invalid point, that I debunked?

      what are conventions if not agreed upon rules?

      Conventions are optional, rules aren’t.

      here is a history of how we actually came to agree upon the aforementioned rules which you may find interesting

      He’s well-known to be wrong about his “history”, and if you read through the comments you’ll find plenty of people telling him that, including references. Cajori wrote the definitive books about the history of Maths (notation). They’re available for free on the Internet Archive - no need to believe some random crank and his blog.