I’m still struggling to understand what you’re trying to say. What damage? I was just advocating for voting for the less shit candidate while you are working towards whatever else.
You were the one that brought up some damage to voting. I keep pressing you to answer what damage? And you’re refusing to answer what.
This is an anarchist community, we don’t vote, we directly act for our needs and desires. We don’t require representation. We are our own representatives.
Do Finnish people directly act on their own needs and eliminate the sources of damages?
I’m talking about voting for the less shit candidate while you’re working to do away with the current system. That’s commonly called harm or damage reduction.
Do you understand what it means to do damage reduction?
Harm reductions lead to fascism, time immemorial.
Doing away with that system that leads to fascism is true harm elimination. We want cures, not symptom relief.
In what way would voting for the less shit candida, while you do your other things too, lead to fascism?
I don’t understand the logic. Do you understand I’m saying voting for the lesser candidate to slow the movement to fascism while you also do your other things?
I’m struggling to understand your point. Are you asking why you should vote for the less shitty candidate?
Wait, you don’t comprehend your own political system?
We don’t use First Past The Post. Where did you assume I was from and why…?
Now that I read your bio
What kind of damage is Finland producing that you felt the need to reply in an anarchist community?
I’m still struggling to understand what you’re trying to say. What damage? I was just advocating for voting for the less shit candidate while you are working towards whatever else.
You were the one that brought up some damage to voting. I keep pressing you to answer what damage? And you’re refusing to answer what.
This is an anarchist community, we don’t vote, we directly act for our needs and desires. We don’t require representation. We are our own representatives.
Do Finnish people directly act on their own needs and eliminate the sources of damages?
I’m talking about voting for the less shit candidate while you’re working to do away with the current system. That’s commonly called harm or damage reduction.
Do you understand what it means to do damage reduction?
Harm reductions lead to fascism, time immemorial.
Doing away with that system that leads to fascism is true harm elimination. We want cures, not symptom relief.
In what way would voting for the less shit candida, while you do your other things too, lead to fascism?
I don’t understand the logic. Do you understand I’m saying voting for the lesser candidate to slow the movement to fascism while you also do your other things?