cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/57052447

A Google founder has more than doubled his financial contribution to the fight against a proposed wealth tax in California. New filings with the state show that former Alphabet president Sergey Brin donated $25m to a Super Pac dedicated to blocking the tax on top of $20m he had already given.

Brin is not alone among Google’s top brass in upping his financial stake in the campaign against the ballot proposal. The company’s former CEO Eric Schmidt donated $1.02m, adding to a previous $2m contribution.

The tech titans are battling the California Billionaire Tax act, often referred to simply as the billionaire tax. It’s a proposed ballot measure that would require any California resident worth more than $1bn to pay a one-off, 5% tax on their assets to help cover education, food assistance and healthcare programs in the state. It’s sponsored by the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, and is still in the signature-gathering phase.

If the measure reaches the ballot and gains voters’ approval, the tax would apply to billionaires based on their residency as of 1 January 2026. For Brin, worth about $247bn, the bill would likely be upwards of $12bn. That stipulation appears to have caused him and several other billionaires to leave California at the end of last year. Brin relocated to a $42m estate on the north-eastern shore of Lake Tahoe in Nevada, and his Pac donations show Reno as his address. Schmidt’s filings show his address as West Hollywood.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    I find the US legal system more amusing the more I keep stumbling on these cases.

    Spend enough money lobbying or just file a suit against the state, win, and you can get a law repealed.

    Meanwhile, here…

    The governmente draws a project of law.

    The parliamente debates, votes it, discusses it in specialty commitee, votes it again, reviews it until it can get a majority to pass, gets shipped to the President for promulgation and if it gets ratified, it becomes law and is it.

    You have an issue with, you draw your case against the law itself, take it to the Constitutional Court and if you have a case, the law gets to be reviewed and rectified. Not taken down: reviewed. Once a law, unless it gets completely repealed, by another law, you’re stuck with it.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The rich can lobby in your country too.

      The parliamente debates, votes it, discusses it in specialty commitee, votes it again, reviews it until it can get a majority to pass,