really saves on clothes though

No, hanging in the wind as being the receiver. Kinda like tor exit nodes can’t hide. Unlike tor exit nodes (well for the time being) you can get hit for recieving the money and paying for something deemed illegal wiht it.

The best part would be being able to go back and forth at will!

Yup, my wife would give me hell, demand i bring her kitchen shears so we can cut it up, then cut up the kids.

She also gets angry if i don’t break ramen blocks into quarters.

but if you send over lightning network

Heh onion routing for bitcoin payments, that’s pretty neat. The receiver ends up hanging a bit in the wind.

Maybe it could be a steam game or something with pausible deniablilty

It depends on the details of the non-profit. In the circumstances I see, you’re not required to make it public, but you ARE required to provide the list to the government.

I can say, If you started a non-profit and used it to track ice, they most certainly would obtain a list of your doners if they had to go and take it from the hands of your payment provider. Even most crypto isn’t fully safe because of banking reporting required

A cheap NPU could have some uses. If you have a background process that runs continuously, offloading the work to a low-cost NPU can save you both power and processing. Camera authorization, if you get up, it locks; if you sit down, it unlocks. No reason to burn a core or GPU for that. Security/Nanny cameras recognition. Driving systems monitoring a driver losing consciousness and pulling over. We can accomplish this all now with CPUs/GPUs, but purpose-built systems that don’t drain other resources aren’t a bad thing.

Of course, there’s always the downside that they use that chip for recall. Or malware gets a hold of it for recall, ID theft, There’s a whole lot of bad you can do with a low-cost NPU too :)

We need to be more careful than that, no one wants to end up on a list when a non-profit is required to show its books.

Should be a very private and affordable for-profit with some reasonable way to keep payments off the books

looking into my state code, it’s legal if it’s in the lease and they did ammend the lease on renewal to include it.

Morale? no. Legal here? it would appear to be.

I love French idioms. A couple of years of high school French decades ago has left me with recognization of maybe a couple of hundred nouns.

blah blah blah blah fish… wait what?

To a person who is drowning the fish.

Mine used to give me free water and natural gas. I filled my waterbed with hot water when I moved in.

Years later, they changed it over so that the whole building was metered and the price was divided.

Interesting story, but I’ve seen the same work with how many ass in assassian

you can probe the stuff it’s bad at, and a lot of it doesn’t line up well with the story that it’s how people were corrected.

It can’t handle things it’s not trained on very well, or at least not anything substantially different from what it was trained on.

It can usually apply rules it’s trained on to a small corpus of data in its training data. Give me a list of female YA authors. But when you ask it for something more general (how many R’s there are in certain words) it often fails.

It’ll certainly be of lesser quality even if they go through steps to make it able to address it.

good documentation and open projects ported might be enough to give you working code, but it’s not going to be able to optimize it without being trained on tons of optimization data.

Probably explains why quora started sending me multiple daily emails about shit i didn’t care about and removed unsubscribe buttons form the emails.

I don’t delete many accounts… but that was one of them

Works well for now. Wait until there’s something new that it hasn’t been trained on. It needs that Stack Exchange data to train on.

You might well be right, but I don’t think enough time has passed to call this indifference just yet.

China is mad because it was already sourcing oil from there. Apparently, they had a contingent that met with M the day he was taken. So I don’t think their vague threat really counts in this scenario yet.

America does have a decent-sized military and someone at the head who needs to prove himself every time he’s challenged. Most countries don’t really like it at least on the basis that they’re next, but challenging him would be more likely to make them next.

These are the kind of things that take a long time to iron out. If they’re going to do something about it, they’re going to wait until a few others start to do things about it.

It’s a speech. He has a hypothesis at best, and expertly lays out one way for it to go.

If one country did it, they’d try to give them the Venezuela treatment.

Don’t get me wrong, I think the overall concept has incredible legs, but the finer details of tit-for-tat and retaliation aren’t quite fleshed out.

I mean, obviously ten.

But I at least understand 16.

I deeply worry about the percentage just next to the other three numbers.